42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-4862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of Cavity-stabilized Flames in Supersonic Flows Using Reduced Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms

Abstract: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to replicate the products of the detonation from the experiments, the gas composition was derived from the Chapman-Jouguet calculations with the species N 2 , H 2 O, CO, CO 2 , O 2 , H 2 , O, H, and OH. For the chemical reactions inside the cavity with C 2 H 4 , the TP2 reduced kinetic model was used and no turbulence-chemistry interaction was taken into account [12]. The computational domain consisted of the full width and height of the test section with a total of 12.4 million cells.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to replicate the products of the detonation from the experiments, the gas composition was derived from the Chapman-Jouguet calculations with the species N 2 , H 2 O, CO, CO 2 , O 2 , H 2 , O, H, and OH. For the chemical reactions inside the cavity with C 2 H 4 , the TP2 reduced kinetic model was used and no turbulence-chemistry interaction was taken into account [12]. The computational domain consisted of the full width and height of the test section with a total of 12.4 million cells.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a), it has been designed for the conditions of incoming Mach number M∞ = 6 at the entrance and the truncation wedge angle of the leading-edge is 3°. The Busemann inlet design will result in smaller wetted areas, compared to that of normal inlet design, to reduce internal drag, and lower heating load to the structure [6], [7], [8] and [9], which would yield a further reduction in the amount of active cooling airflow required by a similar twodimensional geometry. However, the full-scale streamline-traced Busemann inlet would be too long to achieve the lower total pressure loss under the assumption of inviscid flow.…”
Section: Model Configuration and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of cavity-based flame-holder have been done numerically without considering the chemical reaction and the experimental tests [4], [5], [6] and [7]. However, for a practical application to a supersonic combustion, it is crucial and highly demanding to carry out a numerical analysis on a cavity flow for flame holding in chemical reactions, prior to expensive experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value for Pr t was selected to be 0.9. Chemical reactions were modeled using the reduced kinetic mechanism generated by the Princeton University 15 . This mechanism consists of 22 species and it was developed based on the detailed mechanism of Wang and Laskin.…”
Section: Computational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%