2015
DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.995845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Use in Paramedic Education Research (SUPER): A Descriptive Study

Abstract: Objectives. The purpose of this research was to characterize the use of simulation in initial paramedic education programs in order assist stakeholders’ efforts to target educational initiatives and resources. This group sought to provide a snapshot of what simulation resources programs have or have access to and how they are used; faculty perceptions about simulation; whether program characteristics, resources, or faculty training influence simulation use; and if simulation resources are uniform for patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly salient if universal standards are proposed relating to the replacement of clinical practice with simulation, rather than standards which recognise contextual differences and are conditional based on resourcing and access. Recent surveys have shown that professions may have adequate access to equipment‐type simulation resources (task trainers, programmable manikins, simulated patients, equipment) but lack the faculty resources to use them in a standardised way—in nursing (in Australia, New Zealand; Bogossian et al, ), in paramedicine (USA; McKenna et al, ), in speech pathology (Australia; MacBean, Theodoros, Davidson, & Hill, ) and in radiology (Patel & Dennick, ). Barriers experienced included staff time and lack of training and resource development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly salient if universal standards are proposed relating to the replacement of clinical practice with simulation, rather than standards which recognise contextual differences and are conditional based on resourcing and access. Recent surveys have shown that professions may have adequate access to equipment‐type simulation resources (task trainers, programmable manikins, simulated patients, equipment) but lack the faculty resources to use them in a standardised way—in nursing (in Australia, New Zealand; Bogossian et al, ), in paramedicine (USA; McKenna et al, ), in speech pathology (Australia; MacBean, Theodoros, Davidson, & Hill, ) and in radiology (Patel & Dennick, ). Barriers experienced included staff time and lack of training and resource development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent surveys have shown that professions may have adequate access to equipment-type simulation resources (task trainers, programmable manikins, simulated patients, equipment) but lack the faculty resources to use them in a standardised way-in nursing (in Australia, New Zealand; Bogossian et al, 2017), in paramedicine (USA; McKenna et al, 2015), in speech pathology (Australia;…”
Section: Lagging Translational Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has been used successfully to increase survival rates in the hospital setting. 18 , 19 However, its use in EMS training programs varies, 20 and there are no published reports correlating simulation training among paramedics with improved OHCA outcomes. Nonetheless, in low call-volume settings this may be the best option to maintain resuscitation skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 It targets specific trainee needs by allowing repetition and providing consistency that would be difficult to achieve when dealing with real patients. 13 Simulation training also allows exposure to rare complex scenarios and gives multiple trainees the same learning opportunities. 12 Simulation training has even been shown to be more cost-effective than conventional learning techniques by leading to improved standards in patient care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%