2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02383-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation-to-real domain adaptation with teacher–student learning for endoscopic instrument segmentation

Abstract: Purpose Segmentation of surgical instruments in endoscopic video streams is essential for automated surgical scene understanding and process modeling. However, relying on fully supervised deep learning for this task is challenging because manual annotation occupies valuable time of the clinical experts. Methods We introduce a teacher–student learning approach that learns jointly from anno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from binary segmentation, the model trained using the proposed data generation workflow outperformed all the other models, achieving mean IoU scores of 85.26%, 93.02% and 57.72% on UCL, MICCAI '17 and RARP45 datasets respectively. Here, we noticed a more consistent divergence compared to CoSegGAN and Endo-sim2real [23], [24] and differences around 2-3% with Colleoni et al and Ozawa et al (on MICCAI '17). Following experiments carried in [9], we believe that these results can be explained and also enforce the idea that a better image quality leads DL models to enhanced segmentation capabilities.…”
Section: B Results Of Phasesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Starting from binary segmentation, the model trained using the proposed data generation workflow outperformed all the other models, achieving mean IoU scores of 85.26%, 93.02% and 57.72% on UCL, MICCAI '17 and RARP45 datasets respectively. Here, we noticed a more consistent divergence compared to CoSegGAN and Endo-sim2real [23], [24] and differences around 2-3% with Colleoni et al and Ozawa et al (on MICCAI '17). Following experiments carried in [9], we believe that these results can be explained and also enforce the idea that a better image quality leads DL models to enhanced segmentation capabilities.…”
Section: B Results Of Phasesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Surprisingly, Endo-sim2real and Endo-sim2real (v2) showed performances far below the ones they achieved when they have been proposed. A potential explanation can lie in the simulation instruments considered in our work that greatly differ from the more realistic ones used in [23], [24], thus breaking the consistency learning framework employed by these two methods. All segmentation models trained on simulation data (No I2I) were not able to reach more than 39.52% IoU on UCL dataset while decreasing to ∼5% and 0% when testing on MICCAI '17 and RARP45, thus proving one more time the efficacy of applying I2I techniques to support supervised training.…”
Section: B Results Of Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This method achieved a mean Dice score of 87.41 (94.35) on the ROBUST-MIS dataset. Sahu et al (2021) used a teacher-student learning approach that learned from annotated simulation data and unlabeled real data. They redesigned their Endo-Sim2Real framework based on a teacher-student approach, and used a TerNaus11 as the backbone segmentation model.…”
Section: Tool Segmentation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%