Simulation studies on the effect of absorbers on dose distribution in rotational radiotherapy

Ivanova, T; Bliznakova, Kristina; Malatara, Georgia; Kardamakis, D.; Kolitsi, Z.; Pallikarakis, N.

doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.12.001

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[4][5][6] The rotary motion of the gantry combined with the advancing motion of the table allows the radiation source to move around the patient along a spiral track. [7] On the opposite side of the gantry, there is a matrix of detectors, which enables the collection of CT images. [8,9] An "inverse planning" system is used for treatment planning.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the modulation factor on the treatment plan quality and execution time in Tomotherapy in head and neck cancer: In-phantom study

Ryczkowski

Piotrowski

2013

J Can Res Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Infl uence of the modulation factor on the treatment plan quality and execution time in Tomotherapy in head and neck cancer:In-phantom study ABSTRACT Purpose: The overall aim was to conduct an analytical study of the impact of the modulation factor (MF) on the quality of the head and neck treatment plans and their execution time on Tomotherapy.Materials and Methods: In-phantom (RANDO ® Alderson) planning study of the head and neck cancer was performed. Thirteen different plans in terms of MF were prepared. Other optimization parameters were the same for all plans.Results: Analysis of treatment plans in terms of quality shows that MF < 1.4 does not provide an accepted dose distribution (physician decision). Statistically significant differences were observed for plans with an MF < 1.6. No differences were obtained for plans with MF from 6.0 to 1.8. Decreasing of MF leads to a shorter time of irradiation. The maximum rotational speed has been reached for an MF = 3.0. Further reducing this however produces no decrease in the time of irradiation. The actual and planned values of the MF were compared. The optimal range of MF for head and neck was determined as 3.0 > MF > 1.8. The lower limit increases to 2.4 when hard reduction of the dose in critical organs is required.Conclusions: It was showed that the final MF value is less than the value calculated after each loop of optimization. The computer system reduces MF by shortening the longest time and increasing the average time of leaves opening. Increase in the average time is obtained by eliminating the use of leafs with the shortest times of opening, thereby reducing the dose in critical organs that are outside the direct irradiation area.

show abstract