1999
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100020013x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Water Uptake in Maize, Using Different Levels of Process Detail

Abstract: Daily crop water uptake was simulated using algorithms from three crop simulation models, CropSyst, CERES, and EPIC (listed in order of decreasing process detail). Simulated results were compared with measurements of sap flow and soil water content for maize (Zea mays L.) growing at Prosser, WA, under a wet and a dry irrigation treatment, and with soil water content measurements for nonirrigated maize at Davis, CA. At Prosser, the dry treatment imposed only a mild stress; at Davis, the stress was severe. Simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been used in detailed studies of maize cropping (i.e. Jara & Stöckle, 1999; Bellocchi et al ., 2002) and has been shown to be robust and accurate for a diverse range of local environments, including those found within Cameroon. The different submodels included in CropSyst are described with a similar level of detail, so it is a well‐balanced crop simulator, simulating different crops from a common set of parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been used in detailed studies of maize cropping (i.e. Jara & Stöckle, 1999; Bellocchi et al ., 2002) and has been shown to be robust and accurate for a diverse range of local environments, including those found within Cameroon. The different submodels included in CropSyst are described with a similar level of detail, so it is a well‐balanced crop simulator, simulating different crops from a common set of parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also analytical approaches that consider water potential as the driving force for water movement in the soil-plant continuum. A physically-based approach for modelling water uptake was developed by Campbell (1991) and applied by Jara & Stöckle (1999) and Stöckle et al (2003). Some considerations of this approach that are potentially useful in SWAT include: (a) impact of soil structure as well as other factors on root distribution and therefore on soil resistance, particularly at low root length density; (b) more accurate values for root resistance and leaf resistance to water flow, calculated from Fig.…”
Section: Root Function: Water Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of the short time period following irrigation or rainfall, a moisture gradient profile develops from dry at the top to moist at the limit of the wetting zone. In this situation, predictions of water uptake patterns depend on the hypotheses of the plant–soil–water interactions models (Jara & Stockle 1999). The spatial layout of drip irrigation designs and the choice of frequency, amount and rate of water delivery allow controlling the spatial and temporal distribution of water application in the root zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%