ABSTRACT. Development / nterest in site-specific irrigation management has risen over the past decade due in part to compliment successful commercialization of other site-specific management technologies and the fact that both deficit and excess water availability greatly impact crop yield and quality. Center pivot and linear-move irrigation systems provide a natural platform upon which to develop site-specific irrigation management technologies due to their current and increasing usage, large area of coverage, and relatively high degree of automation. Site-specific irrigation management hardware and control systems have been reported in the literature (Fraisse et al., 1995;King et al., 1996;Sadler et al., 1996;Evans et al., 1996;Harting, 1999;Perry et al., 2003). In each case, spatially variable water application was successfully achieved on a limited scale. However, with each successful implementation, one common impediment was the lack of a variable rate sprinkler to facilitate spatially variable water application. King and Kincaid (2004) linear-move irrigation systems. Variable sprinkler flow rate is achieved by cycling a retractable concentric pin into the sprinkler nozzle orifice to provide a time-averaged variable flow rate over a range of 36% to 100% in flow for a particular nozzle size. The application pattern radius of the variable rate sprinklers tested was reduced roughly 15% under variable flow conditions. This suggests that application uniformity should be comparable to conventional sprinklers on center pivot and linear-move irrigation systems over an application rate range of 36% to 100%. The objective of this study was to implement a control system algorithm for individual sprinkler control and test the variable flow rate sprinkler on a three-span linear-move irrigation system to evaluate water application uniformity and application of spatially varied target amounts of water and chemical under field conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
IRRIGATION SYSTEMThirty-two of the Prototype II variable rate sprinklers ( fig. 1) described by King and Kincaid (2004) were constructed. The selected concentric pin size was 4.76 mm (3/16 in.) in combination with a straight-bore brass nozzle size of 5.95 mm (15/64 in.) to theoretically provide a 36% to 100% range in flow from the variable rate sprinkler due to change in orifice area, assuming constant nozzle pressure. Pulse width modulation (PWM) refers to modulation of voltage on-and off-times over a specified time period. A 1-min time period was used in this study. A 10% duty cycle means that the voltage on-time is 10% of the specified time period, 6 s in this case. Thus, by specifying a duty cycle of 0 to 100%, the control system energized the solenoid to insert the concentric pin in the nozzle bore 0 to 100% of the time, which was repeated at 1-min intervals. The prototype sprinklers were installed on a three-span 100-m (327-ft) linear-move system located at