2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Unequal-Variance Binormal Multireader ROC Decision Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, our ROC curve analysis was performed by five readers with 30 positive and 30 negative images for each protocol, using DBM MRMC software. In an earlier study, it was reported that the software used in the current study requires at least five readers and 25 positive and 25 negative images, to acquire more reliable ROC curves 33. Therefore, our statistical analysis of the ROC curve was likely reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourth, our ROC curve analysis was performed by five readers with 30 positive and 30 negative images for each protocol, using DBM MRMC software. In an earlier study, it was reported that the software used in the current study requires at least five readers and 25 positive and 25 negative images, to acquire more reliable ROC curves 33. Therefore, our statistical analysis of the ROC curve was likely reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Each of the 60 images was displayed in a randomized order on the monitor and analyzed with a continuously distributed test. DBM MRMC software (Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to calculate the mean area under curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals for each protocol, and to calculate the difference in the average AUC and P ‐values between each protocol 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33. The significance level for all evaluations was 5%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates a problem for the parametric ROC methods that have largely relied on using the same distribution for both diseased and non-diseased populations. The most popular of these parametric models, namely the binormal ROC curve (19), often falls short in capturing the heterogeneity of the diseased population. This has been long recognized in the ROC field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Hillis,19 when the variance components are assumed to be the same across truth states and modalities, the R&M model has the following interpretations: (1) ROC ratings for each reader are generated from an equal-variance binormal model (i.e, a binormal model such that variances of the nondiseased and diseased ROC ratings are equal); and (2) the expected differences (or separations) between the nondiseased and diseased ROC ratings vary across readers, with the separations having the same variance for each modality. This last result implies that for a simulation study that assumes equal AUCs across modalities (i.e., a null-hypothesis study), the resulting AUC estimates will have the same variance for each modality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such unsymmetric ROC curves have been seen as far back as the early psychophysical experiments of the 1960s 21,22 and in recent studies evaluating medical imaging modalities. 19,[23][24][25][26] Unsymmetric ROC curves have motivated other models of ROC ratings [27][28][29] and are sometimes characterized by a mean-to-sigma ratio defined as the difference of the binormal means divided by the difference of the binormal standard deviations across truth states in an unequal-variance binormal model. 19,21,26 For this reason, Hillis 19 introduced an unequal-variance binormal model by allowing some of the variance components to depend on truth but with some additional constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%