2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12182-001-0215-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of unconventional well tests with the finite volume method

Abstract: and the numerical model developed by the authors are presented and discussed. A radial geometry in the vertical plane was implemented so as to thoroughly describe near-wellbore phenomena. The model was to correctly reproduce the transient pressure behavior. The reason for this is the robustness of the method, which is independent of the gridding options because the discretization is performed in the physical space. The model is able to describe the phenomena taking place in the reservoir even in complex situat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Well testing is a valuable source of information on reservoir properties and a lot of work has been done and is being performed in this realm (Kruseman and Ridder, 1990;Horne, 1995;Fetter, 2001;Bourdet, 2002;Gringarten, 2008;Fokker et al, 2005;Beretta et al, 2007;Benetatos and Viberti, 2010;Viberti, 2010;Verga et al, 2011;Cancelliere and Verga, 2012). Two issues remain which need further attention in well test analysis: the inclusion of reservoir heterogeneity and the treatment of rate variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well testing is a valuable source of information on reservoir properties and a lot of work has been done and is being performed in this realm (Kruseman and Ridder, 1990;Horne, 1995;Fetter, 2001;Bourdet, 2002;Gringarten, 2008;Fokker et al, 2005;Beretta et al, 2007;Benetatos and Viberti, 2010;Viberti, 2010;Verga et al, 2011;Cancelliere and Verga, 2012). Two issues remain which need further attention in well test analysis: the inclusion of reservoir heterogeneity and the treatment of rate variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present a numerical model of two-phase flow for well test interpretation in a multiwell system firstly. When it comes to the differentiation of the partially differential flow equations, finite difference method [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and finite volume method [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] are both commonly employed in solving fluid flow equation systems. However, in unstructured grids, formulating the finite volume method is much easier.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, injection tests eliminate emissions during reservoir appraisal and, except for fluid sampling, can provide all the information needed to estimate the well productivity at a reasonably low cost and with a good degree of reliability (Levitan, 2002;Beretta et al, 2007). Since the physical phenomena characterizing injection test are different with respect to the conventional well test, numerical models capable to provide a reliable interpretation of the data have been developed over the last years (Verga et al, 2008;Cancelliere and Verga, 2012). An example of successful field experiences was presented in the study by Beretta et al (2006;.…”
Section: Injection Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%