2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10503593.3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the present and future projection of permafrost on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau with statistical and machine learning models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through careful field surveys, we found that some of the RTSs in the study area have a clear headwall similar to that of the main scarp of landslide in non-permafrost region. The thickness of the active layer in the study area generally ranged from 1 to 4 m (Ni et al, 2021). We noticed that many small-scale collapses or slides tended to form at the headwall of the RTSs, forming numerous RTSs with irregular boundaries (Figures 2c and 2f).…”
Section: Study Area and Field Surveysmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Through careful field surveys, we found that some of the RTSs in the study area have a clear headwall similar to that of the main scarp of landslide in non-permafrost region. The thickness of the active layer in the study area generally ranged from 1 to 4 m (Ni et al, 2021). We noticed that many small-scale collapses or slides tended to form at the headwall of the RTSs, forming numerous RTSs with irregular boundaries (Figures 2c and 2f).…”
Section: Study Area and Field Surveysmentioning
confidence: 91%