1966
DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830110510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the initial psychiatric interview

Abstract: Systematic exploration of interviewing techniques is made possible by the procedures described here. Properly used this will be an important training device.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CLIENT 1 program has as a general background several diverse, but nevertheless related, lines of research: (a) guidance information retrieval programs (e.g., Tiedeman, Davis, Durstine, Ellis, Fletcher, Landy, & O'Hara, 1970), (b) question-answering natural language programs (e.g., Winograd,197 l), (c) personality model simulations that are not interactive (e.g., Loehlin, 1968;Tompkins, & Messick, 1963), (d) programs using computational linguistics to simulate therapeutic interviewing (e.g., Weizenbaum, 1966), (e) simulations of human problemsolving (e.g., Newel1 & Simon, 1972), and (0 interview simulations using interactive personality models (e.g., Bellman, Friend, & Kurland, 1966;Colby, Weber, & Hilf, 1971;Starkweather, Kamp, & Monto, 1967. ) These various lines of research differ among themselves and with CLIENT 1 with respect to their natural language handling capability, the extent to which they are interactive, and their inclusion of personality models and problem-solving features.…”
Section: The Client 1 Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CLIENT 1 program has as a general background several diverse, but nevertheless related, lines of research: (a) guidance information retrieval programs (e.g., Tiedeman, Davis, Durstine, Ellis, Fletcher, Landy, & O'Hara, 1970), (b) question-answering natural language programs (e.g., Winograd,197 l), (c) personality model simulations that are not interactive (e.g., Loehlin, 1968;Tompkins, & Messick, 1963), (d) programs using computational linguistics to simulate therapeutic interviewing (e.g., Weizenbaum, 1966), (e) simulations of human problemsolving (e.g., Newel1 & Simon, 1972), and (0 interview simulations using interactive personality models (e.g., Bellman, Friend, & Kurland, 1966;Colby, Weber, & Hilf, 1971;Starkweather, Kamp, & Monto, 1967. ) These various lines of research differ among themselves and with CLIENT 1 with respect to their natural language handling capability, the extent to which they are interactive, and their inclusion of personality models and problem-solving features.…”
Section: The Client 1 Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included in this last category are works by Bellman, Friend, and Kurland (1966), Starkweather,Kamp, and Monto (1967), and Colby, Weber, and }Ulf of that process is sketchy. We do know that at each step of the interview the simulation provides the therapist with three alternative qUestions to ask and that for each question the patient has three possible responses.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colby & Gilbert, 1964), (e) simulations of human problem solving (e.g. Newell & Simon, 1972), and (f) interview simulation using personality models and man-machine interaction (e.g., Bellman, Friend, & Kurland, 1966;Colby, Weber, & Hilf, 1971;Starkweather, Kamp & Monto, 1967). These six lines of research differ among themselves and with CLIENT 1 with respect to their inclusion of a personality model, 164 the extent to which they are man-machine interactive, their problem-solving sophistication, and their natural language handling capacities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A collection of such decisions which determines behavior over a given period of time may be called a policy. In other words, a policy is a settled course of procedure which determines what decision is to be made on the basis of the available information pattern, Bellman, et al 5 Obviously an optimal policy from a public health point of view is one which maximizes health services in a given community within the framework of a limited budget.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%