2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-008-0433-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the Indian monsoon using the RegCM3–ROMS regional coupled model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, considering the major influence of SSTs on the climate of the Caribbean and on simulated precipitation, accurate representation of SSTs in the models could improve their performance. The dynamical downscaling using PRECIS RCM uses prescribed SSTs, but a model set-up in which SSTs are allowed to dynamically interact with and respond to changes in the overlaying atmosphere has been shown to perform better at simulating precipitation in other parts of the world (Artale et al, 2009;Ratnam et al, 2009). Such RCM studies are, however, non-existent for the Caribbean region.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, considering the major influence of SSTs on the climate of the Caribbean and on simulated precipitation, accurate representation of SSTs in the models could improve their performance. The dynamical downscaling using PRECIS RCM uses prescribed SSTs, but a model set-up in which SSTs are allowed to dynamically interact with and respond to changes in the overlaying atmosphere has been shown to perform better at simulating precipitation in other parts of the world (Artale et al, 2009;Ratnam et al, 2009). Such RCM studies are, however, non-existent for the Caribbean region.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, these studies reported an improvement in dynamic downscaling due to coupled models. For example, using the coupled RegCM3 and the ocean model ROMS, Ratnam et al (2009) showed that the coupled model captured the main features of the Indian monsoon and simulated a substantially more realistic spatial distribution and monthly mean of monsoon rainfall compared to the uncoupled atmosphere-only model. A more striking feature is that in an East Asian summer monsoon (EASM) downscaling study (Yao and Zhang, 2009), using the coupled RegCM3 with specified SST the simulated correlation coefficients of the temporal variation of summer rainfall between the uncoupled model RegCM3 and observation were only 0.30 and 0.29 over the Yangtze River Valley and South China, respectively.…”
Section: Temporal Variability and Possible Impact Due To Coupled Oceamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a very similar type of bias pattern has been found in the superparameterized CAM (SP-CAM) mentioned previously (Khairoutdinov et al 2008), as well as the superparameterized version of the NASA Goddard finite-volume general circulation model (fvGCM; Tao et al 2009). Meanwhile, a positive off-equatorial rain bias has been seen in a number of recent high-resolution (but still not convection-resolving) simulations of the Asian summer monsoon (Cherchi and Navarra 2007;Lau and Ploshay 2009;Nguyen and McGregor 2009;Ratnam et al 2009). Given that this type of bias does not appear as prominently in the conventional versions of the CAM and NASA fvGCM (Khairoutdinov et al 2008;Tao et al 2009), it would seem that the coupling between parameterized convection and the resolved circulation is somehow involved.…”
Section: Space-time Variability Of Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines, Khairoutdinov et al (2005) showed that the SP-CAM's excessive rainfall in the northwest Pacific could be mitigated by altering the domain configuration of the model's cloud-resolving convective parameterization. Alternatively, Ratnam et al (2009) showed that the positive rainfall bias in their simulations of the Asian summer monsoon could be mitigated by allowing two-way coupling between the ocean and atmosphere. However, this improvement came at the expense of producing a compensating negative bias in the underlying SST (with amplitude of *1°C).…”
Section: Space-time Variability Of Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%