1997
DOI: 10.1109/17.584927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of structural steel erection to assess innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Position, Connect, and Unhook tasks were selected for the analysis due to the high exposure to the hazard of falls from elevations that workers encounter while performing these tasks. A study by Slaughter and Eraso (1997) evaluated the impact of innovations on construction processes considering the level of danger posed by the tasks. .…”
Section: Characteristics Of Steel Erection Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Position, Connect, and Unhook tasks were selected for the analysis due to the high exposure to the hazard of falls from elevations that workers encounter while performing these tasks. A study by Slaughter and Eraso (1997) evaluated the impact of innovations on construction processes considering the level of danger posed by the tasks. .…”
Section: Characteristics Of Steel Erection Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclic fitting and realignment trials during assembly and plumbness of steel pipe spools and modules are critical because imperfections unavoidably occur during fabrication and transportation [1]. A series of studies by Love et al (2012), notes that 10-20% of the total project cost is wasted (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category includes applying safety plans to the design stage by estimating new potential accidents and analyzing the potential causes. We have previously conducted studies estimating the risk grades for each construction building type and developing a safety evaluation method using the first prevention method (Slaughter and Eraso, 1997). This method requires evaluations based on long-term past accident statistics; however, there are restrictions for evaluating the safety of using a prototype construction robot on a real construction site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%