1994
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.1994.10474655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Stationary Gaussian Processes in [0, 1]d

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
219
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
219
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we have included outliers which are not far away from the rest of the curves in terms of any distance but differ in shape. We use a family of models to generate shape outliers which was introduced in López-Pintado and Romo (2009) based on the covariance kernels presented in Wood and Chan (1994). More concretely, the curves are generated from a Gaussian process with covariance kernel γ (s, t) = k exp{−c|t − s| µ }, with s, t ∈ [0, 1], and k, c, µ > 0.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have included outliers which are not far away from the rest of the curves in terms of any distance but differ in shape. We use a family of models to generate shape outliers which was introduced in López-Pintado and Romo (2009) based on the covariance kernels presented in Wood and Chan (1994). More concretely, the curves are generated from a Gaussian process with covariance kernel γ (s, t) = k exp{−c|t − s| µ }, with s, t ∈ [0, 1], and k, c, µ > 0.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample autocorrelation sequence shown by the circles in both plots of Figure 4 is the average of all 10,000 individual sequences. While there is a small systematic difference between the average sample autocorrelation sequences generated by the two models individually, the variation in the individual sequences is quite small (generally less than the diameter of the circles), particularly when compared to the uncertainty due to the finite sample size N. To assess this latter source of uncertainty, we generated 25,000 realizations of length N from both an autoregressive process and a fractionally differenced process (with values of f and d again dictated by estimates from the SCICEX 97 profile) using an appropriate exact simulation procedure [Kay, 1981;Davies and Harte, 1987;Wood and Chan, 1994;Dietrich and Newsam, 1997;Gneiting, 2000;Craigmile, 2003]. We computedr d for each realization and then formed the sample average of ther d 's to estimate E{r d }, which are displayed as thick curves in Figure 4.…”
Section: Appendix A: Three Models For Scicex Draft Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this form, the problem of characterising numerically stationary covariances is the same without stationarity. Nevertheless it might be possible to take advantage of the special Toeplitz form of stationary field covariances to make efficient computations, for instance by imbedding it in a circulant matrix, as it has been made in [21,2]. For the same reasons, the numerical complexity of the problem reduces since the dimension of the space where live stationary covariances is smaller, but the combinatorial symmetry is lost, thus there is no gain on the theoretical point of view.…”
Section: Theorem 28 a Function α On H Is The Reduced Covariance Of mentioning
confidence: 99%