2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2012.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of SiO2/S coating deposition in a pilot plant set-up for coking inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation and limitation of the surface reaction schemes and kinetic parameters have been discussed in our previous study, and the models used in Table 2 were in good agreement with the pilot scale test (Wang et al, 2013) . In Table 2, E a for Si deposition is chosen based on the apparent activation energy of the SiO 2 growth rate in a hot-wall TEOS system, and in S deposition they are based on the apparent activation energies for related sulfide pyrolyses (Wang et al, 2013). Therefore, the schemes present the apparent reactions correlating gas intermediates and coating deposition rates.…”
Section: Surface Reaction Modelsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The validation and limitation of the surface reaction schemes and kinetic parameters have been discussed in our previous study, and the models used in Table 2 were in good agreement with the pilot scale test (Wang et al, 2013) . In Table 2, E a for Si deposition is chosen based on the apparent activation energy of the SiO 2 growth rate in a hot-wall TEOS system, and in S deposition they are based on the apparent activation energies for related sulfide pyrolyses (Wang et al, 2013). Therefore, the schemes present the apparent reactions correlating gas intermediates and coating deposition rates.…”
Section: Surface Reaction Modelsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, a simplified one-step reaction mechanism is adopted according to our previous study (Wang et al, 2013). In this mechanism, Si(OH) 4 , H 2 S, CH 3 SH and CH 3 SCH 3 are proposed to be the final Si/S-containing intermediate products of the decomposition of TEOS and DMDS before entering the tube reactor according to the thermodynamic calculation (Wang et al, 2013). The surface reaction schemes and kinetic parameters are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Surface Reaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results indicated that the anti-coking performance increased from 37% to 69% as the thickness of alumina coatings increased from 318 to 1280 nm. In addition, Xu et al [10][11][12] published a series of articles on the anti-coking property of the SiO 2 /S composite coating during light naphtha steam cracking and reported that the SiO 2 /S coating reduces coke yield by 60% compared with the uncoated tube. More recently, Liu et al [13] prepared a MnCr 2 O 4 spinel coating on HP40 alloy by pack cementation and subsequent thermal oxidation and applied it to inhibit coke formation during light naphtha thermal cracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Al 2 O 3 coating, Eser et al [1] and Liu et al [15] investigated the effectiveness of MOCVD Al 2 O 3 coatings in mitigating carbon deposition due to thermal oxidation in thermal stressing of Jet A (350 o C and 3.5 MPa, 1 mL/min for 5 h), and thermal cracking of Chinese RP-3 jet fuel under supercritical conditions (inlet temperature, 575 o C; outlet temperature, 650 o C; pressure, 5 MPa), respectively. For SiO 2 coating, Xu et al [16][17][18] published a series of articles on anti-coking property of the SiO 2 /S composite coating during light naphtha steam cracking, and reported that the SiO 2 /S coating reduces coke yield by 60% compared with that observed in the blank tube. However, the MOCVD Al 2 O 3 coating is essentially amorphous instead of crystalline, and its surface presents coordinatively unsaturated Lewis acid sites and strong Brønsted acid sites, which are beneficial to form coking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%