2011
DOI: 10.5424/fs/20112003-11070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of silvicultural scenarios and economic efficiency

Abstract: Seven silvicultural scenarios for pure and even aged maritime pine stands were simulated using a diameter class growth and yield model, for three levels of site index (low, medium and high). Total and merchantable yield along rotation and mean annual increment at rotation age were simulated. Revenue obtained from sale of standing timber (three commercial thinning and final harvest) was estimated. Costs paid for stand establishment (site preparation and plantation) and treatments (release, pre-commercial thinni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is not expected to observe losses in total yield due to self-thinning. Assuming that the results obtained by Alegria (2011), using natural regeneration of maritime pine for a scenario with Fw = 0.20 (this being the most similar to our proposal) are generalizable, it is expected that the silvicultural model results in one of the highest values for stand yield, average annual increment and pulp wood yield.…”
Section: Stand Density Modelsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Hence, it is not expected to observe losses in total yield due to self-thinning. Assuming that the results obtained by Alegria (2011), using natural regeneration of maritime pine for a scenario with Fw = 0.20 (this being the most similar to our proposal) are generalizable, it is expected that the silvicultural model results in one of the highest values for stand yield, average annual increment and pulp wood yield.…”
Section: Stand Density Modelsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This association is commonly known and has been reported by multiple authors (e.g. Alegria 2011;Dean et al 2013;del Río et al 2001;Kuliešis et al 2010;Isomäki 2004a, 2004b;Moulinier et al 2015;Nilsson et al 2010;Tang et al 2016;Zeide 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Most studies on the effect of stand density on productivity have used stand volume increment (in cubic metres) as the measure of productivity. Economically, however, production optimisation should be based on the value of the products, in particular timber assortments (Alegria 2011;Nilsson et al 2010;Tahvonen et al 2013;Zeide 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studied stands showed a strong relationship between stand density and mean DBH, a correlation which is widely known [20,45,54]. Therefore, if stand density is correlated with tree size and tree size is correlated with carbon content, then it could be expected that there is a correlation between the stand density and the carbon content in tree biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%