Magmas Under Pressure 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811301-1.00016-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Silicate Melts Under Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
8
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…En melt and, to a lesser extent, Di melt show a negative pressure dependence in some pressure ranges. Such an anomalous behavior was also reported in a basalt and another silicate melt 18 , based on both FPMD simulation 19 and experimental measurements 20,21 . The negative pressure dependence is due to either the Si-O bond weakening by the pressure-induced bending of the Si-O-Si angle 21,22 or possibly the increasing concentration of five-fold Si-O coordination species 23,24 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En melt and, to a lesser extent, Di melt show a negative pressure dependence in some pressure ranges. Such an anomalous behavior was also reported in a basalt and another silicate melt 18 , based on both FPMD simulation 19 and experimental measurements 20,21 . The negative pressure dependence is due to either the Si-O bond weakening by the pressure-induced bending of the Si-O-Si angle 21,22 or possibly the increasing concentration of five-fold Si-O coordination species 23,24 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Combining Eqs. (19)(20)(21), we can obtain dc numerically. The Reynolds number in MO is less than 20 when grain size in MO equals critical size ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: à á ð21þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At core‐mantle boundary pressures, the proportion of sixfold silicon decreases with increasing temperature from 80% at 3,000 K to 70% at 4,000 K to 55% at 5,000 K. The proportions of silicon in fourfold, fivefold, and sixfold coordination in pyrolite melt are essentially identical to the proportions in CaMgSi 2 O 6 melt at all pressures (Figure S3). Compared to simulations on MORB melt (Bajgain et al, ; Karki et al, ), the proportions of fourfold and fivefold silicon are slightly larger in pyrolite melt and CaMgSi 2 O 6 melt (Sun et al, ) while the proportion of sixfold silicon is a bit lower because of the different degrees of polymerization or M: Si ratios (where M is Mg, Ca, Fe, and other network‐modifier cations), which cumulatively explains the larger average coordination of silicon in MORB melt. The average coordination of silicon at high pressure is likely dependent on the degree of polymerization of the melt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At higher temperatures, the amount of threefold‐coordinated silicon increases, which has never been experimentally investigated, mostly due to the fact that experiments are limited in temperature. Although Karki et al () do not explicitly report threefold silicon in MORB melt, at 3,000 K and ambient pressure, it is reported that 91% of silicon is in fourfold coordination and 5% of silicon is in fivefold coordination with an average coordination of 4, indicating that 4% of silicon is in threefold coordination. At equivalent conditions, we predict that 5% of silicon is threefold, 93% is fourfold, and 1% is fivefold, in agreement with the results of Karki et al () despite the different melt chemistries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation