2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of shrinkage during sintering of additively manufactured silica green bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the printed specimens have an orthotropic type of anisotropy due to similar sintering behaviors in the two axes of the layer and only a different behavior in the building direction. This orthotropic behavior has been evidenced experimentally by triaxial dilatometry showing sintering shrinkage differences only in the building direction and by microscopy analysis showing architected microstructure containing a higher porosity in the interlayer zone [29][30][31]. This sintering shrinkage orthotropic behavior has been observed also in other additive manufacturing methods such as robocasting [32], fuse deposition modeling [33,34] or binder jetting [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the printed specimens have an orthotropic type of anisotropy due to similar sintering behaviors in the two axes of the layer and only a different behavior in the building direction. This orthotropic behavior has been evidenced experimentally by triaxial dilatometry showing sintering shrinkage differences only in the building direction and by microscopy analysis showing architected microstructure containing a higher porosity in the interlayer zone [29][30][31]. This sintering shrinkage orthotropic behavior has been observed also in other additive manufacturing methods such as robocasting [32], fuse deposition modeling [33,34] or binder jetting [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In general, this approach assumes a mechanistic model with equivalent ellipsoidal porosity or grains to justify different directional driving forces [42,44]. Another approach applies the anisotropy directly at the level of the strain rate [31]. Finally, it is possible to apply the anisotropy at the level of the shear and bulk viscosities [29,32,45] which imply anisotropic porous skeleton.…”
Section: Anisotropic Pressureless Sintering Model Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mani'ere et al [23] use the SOVS (Skorohod-Olevsky Viscous Sintering) model to conduct finite element modeling analysis of a printed cup and predict the sintering shrinkage of samples with complex geometric shapes. Kakanuru et al [24] implemented the SOVS model as a custom creep model in finite element software, and determined the required parameters of the SOVS model by minimizing the error between the experimental and simulated relative densities. The dimensional variation of additive-manufactured green bodies during sintering was analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%