1991
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(91)90156-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of shoot vegetative development and growth of unstressed winter wheat

Abstract: Mechanistic crop simulation models can aid in directing research and improving farm management. Recent research on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) canopy development was consolidated into a model of aboveground vegetative development and growth called SHOOTGRO 1.0. The model assumes that water, nutrients, and light do not limit development and growth. Initial conditions of cultivar type (dwarf, semidwarf, mid-tall, and tall), seeding rate, planting depth and date, and latitude are inputs. Daily temperature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
8

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
32
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent works on germination and epicotile extension [78, 81, 183 1 now make it possible to distinguish two phases in the emergence. This is the case in the SHOOTGRO mode1 of McMaster et al [104], in its derivatives (MODWTH3 of Rickman et al [131]) and in STICS. Such an approach allows the simulated duration of emergence to Vary with the three factors temperature, water status of the soi1 and sowing depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent works on germination and epicotile extension [78, 81, 183 1 now make it possible to distinguish two phases in the emergence. This is the case in the SHOOTGRO mode1 of McMaster et al [104], in its derivatives (MODWTH3 of Rickman et al [131]) and in STICS. Such an approach allows the simulated duration of emergence to Vary with the three factors temperature, water status of the soi1 and sowing depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Until the advent of molecular markers (Ellis et al, 2002), cultivars could be grouped as being gibberellic acid sensitive or insensitive, but most cultivars were grouped into one of several relative height classes. For example in the SHOOTGRO model (McMaster et al, 1991;Wilhelm et al, 1993;Zalud et al, 2003), a wheat cultivar was considered as tall if its height was greater than 1.3 m, medium tall if its height was 1.1-1.3 m, semidwarf if its height was 0.95-1.1 m, and dwarf if its height was less than 0.95 m tall. These measurements are for wheat grown in optimal height environments, and reductions in height under stressed conditions are treated the same for all height classes.…”
Section: Plant Height Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently we developed a model (SHOOTGRO 1.0;McMaster et al, 1991) which systematically combined current knowledge of above-ground vegetative development and growth of winter wheat in the absence of environmental stress. SHOOTGRO 1.0 simulates seedling emergence and appearance of tillers, leaves and internodes, based on the accumulation of thermal time [growing degree-days (GDD)], for several cohorts of plants (cohort groupings based on time of seedling emergence).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). SHOOT-GRO 2.0 modifies and extends SHOOTGRO 1.0 (McMaster et al, 1991). Most modifications relate to the addition of soil N and water budget routines and the addition of response functions for crop development and growth to availability of N and water resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%