2020
DOI: 10.1667/rr15552.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Proton-Induced DNA Damage Patterns Using an Improved Clustering Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the number of SSBs from the proton irradiation is lower than that from the electron, while the number of DSBs is higher. It is consistent with the damage behavior as a function of LET obtained with the G0/G1 DNA model by others (Tang et al 2020). Second, both SSBs and DSBs from protons are associated with much larger error bars than from electron and Co-60 irradiations.…”
Section: Dna Damage Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the number of SSBs from the proton irradiation is lower than that from the electron, while the number of DSBs is higher. It is consistent with the damage behavior as a function of LET obtained with the G0/G1 DNA model by others (Tang et al 2020). Second, both SSBs and DSBs from protons are associated with much larger error bars than from electron and Co-60 irradiations.…”
Section: Dna Damage Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In figure 6(a) and (b), we also show the mean and standard deviation of DNA damage from the Co-60 (grey dashed line), electron (red dashed line) and proton (blue dashed line) irradiations on the G0/G1 DNA geometry. Like the metaphase DNA situation, SSBs decrease and DSBs increase along with the increase of the LET (Co-60 and electron to proton), consistent with the previous publications (Tang et al 2020). Meanwhile, a larger fluctuation is also observed for the proton than for the Co-60 and electron irradiations.…”
Section: Dna Damage Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Geant4-DNA platform has since been applied in many studies of damage to the DNA molecule and its higher-order structures in mammalian cells (Figs. 9.17 and 9.18) and other organisms exposed to many radiation types, including those of interest in radiotherapy, space travel, and radiobiology (Chatzipapas et al , 2020; 2021; 2023; Dominguez-Kondo et al , 2021; Dos Santos et al , 2020; Henthorn et al , 2017; Hilgers et al , 2022; Incerti et al , 2016; 2020; Kyriakou et al , 2021; 2022; Lee and Wang, 2019; Margis et al , 2020; Moeini et al , 2020; Mokari et al , 2020; Sakata et al , 2019; Tang et al , 2020; Thibault et al , 2022; Thompson et al , 2022). Development of the Geant4-DNA platform for radiobiological applications included incorporation of a feature allowing for prediction of DNA rejoining kinetics and corresponding cell surviving fraction as a function of time.…”
Section: Applications Of Stochastic Characteristics Of Radiation Inte...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSB = double-strand break; LET = linear energy transfer. Journal of the ICRU 23(1)1-165 2020; Sakata et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2020;Thibault et al, 2022;Thompson et al, 2022). Development of the Geant4-DNA platform for radiobiological applications included incorporation of a feature allowing for prediction of DNA rejoining kinetics and corresponding cell surviving fraction as a function of time.…”
Section: Track Structure For Simulation Of Consequent Biological Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proton microdosimetry study, Tang et al (2020) constructed a simple ellipsoid geometric model as the nucleus, and the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) was adopted to analyze the cellular energy deposition induced by the front of the proton track to predict the yield of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and single-strand breaks (SSBs). In another study, Matsuya et al (2022) utilized the Monte Carlo software PHITS to obtain the complete track of a monoenergetic proton and calculated the DNA damage caused by the entire proton tracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%