The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2022.101280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of plasma transport in the linear plasma device MPS-LD by SOLPS-ITER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the radial direction, N e , T e and T i gradually decrease toward the chamber wall, and the radial N e distributions are similar to those of the Magnum-PSI experiment [17]. Quantitative comparison between BOUT++ and SOLPS-ITER modeling of MPS-LD [34] is also carried out. The trends of the main parameters are in reasonable agreement.…”
Section: Preliminary Results and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, in the radial direction, N e , T e and T i gradually decrease toward the chamber wall, and the radial N e distributions are similar to those of the Magnum-PSI experiment [17]. Quantitative comparison between BOUT++ and SOLPS-ITER modeling of MPS-LD [34] is also carried out. The trends of the main parameters are in reasonable agreement.…”
Section: Preliminary Results and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, the realization of high heating efficiency in medium and high density is a challenge. According to the SOLPS-ITER prediction modeling of MPS-LD, the plasma density at the edge of the plasma beam is higher than 10 18 m −3 [32], which will influence the heating efficiency according to previous section analysis. In figure 5, the density threshold is 5.5 × 10 14 m −3 .…”
Section: The Optimization Of Icrhmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to realize the prediction of ion auxiliary heating in the MPS-LD device, based on the above analysis, the resonance magnetic field of 0.3 T is selected, and the magnetic field configuration is the real auxiliary heating configuration. Figure 11(a) shows the simulated hydrogen plasma density in MPS-LD by using SOLPS-ITER [32], and the location of ion auxiliary heating is labeled by the black dash line (z = −1.85 m). Figure 11(b) shows the corresponding radial density profiles, where the blue line is from the SOLPS-ITER When the resonance magnetic field is 0.3 T, the length of CDAL is about 0.06 m, and the ion parallel velocity equals approximately to the ion sound speed, i.e., when the temperature is 1.5 eV, v // ≈ 10 000 m s −1 .…”
Section: Simulation Prediction For Mps-ldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with tokamak divertors, LPD has significant advantages in cost-effectiveness, convenience of disassembly and target plate replacement, facilitating the evaluation of experimental data, and ability to operate under high heat load conditions with extended pulse durations. Consequently, numerous institutions have devised restrictive LPDs including Magnum-PSI, [2][3][4] MAGPIE, [5,6] GyM, [7,8] Proto-MPEX, [9,10] and MPS-LPD, [11,12] with the purpose of studying the physics underlying PWI and advancing divertor target materials. According to the heat load estimate of the ITER divertor, the target should be capable of withstanding at least a heat flux of 10 MW • m −2 .…”
Section: Introduction and Device Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%