2018
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of orthogonal horizontal components of near‐fault ground motion for specified earthquake source and site characteristics

Abstract: Summary A procedure to generate horizontal pairs of synthetic near‐fault ground motion components for specified earthquake source and site characteristics is presented. Some near‐fault ground motions contain a forward directivity pulse; others do not, even when the conditions for such a pulse are favorable. The proposed procedure generates pulse‐like and non‐pulse‐like motions in appropriate proportions. We use our recent stochastic models of pulse‐like and non‐pulse‐like near‐fault ground motions that are for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity-pulse model proposed by Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian (2018), which describes near-field earthquake ground motions, defines the excitation a g (t). The velocity-pulse model consists of a cosine carrier wave with a period T p , modulated by a truncated cosine function, namely the pulse function, with a period γT p and amplitude V p .…”
Section: Prototype Structure and Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity-pulse model proposed by Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian (2018), which describes near-field earthquake ground motions, defines the excitation a g (t). The velocity-pulse model consists of a cosine carrier wave with a period T p , modulated by a truncated cosine function, namely the pulse function, with a period γT p and amplitude V p .…”
Section: Prototype Structure and Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use the obtained information of EP to simulate multiple sets of MP . This is done using the predictive models proposed by Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian 12 (for R rup > 30 km) and Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian 11 (for R rup 30 km), which relate the MP with the EP . In the simulated set of MP , select the important MP I as per the period range T and use the proposed log‐scaled predictive relations (as per Table 2) between the MP I and ln (RotD50boldSbolda(T)false) to independently estimate mean lnfalse(RotD50boldSboldafalse(boldTfalse)false)¯ and variances σln(boldRotD50Sa(T))2 of RotD50S a for each period in T . Use σln(boldRotD50Sa(T))2 to develop the diagonal variance matrix D . Use the developed variance matrix (D ) and lower triangular correlation matrix ( L ) corresponding to the periods T to transform the target spectrum (RotD50boldSa,Tar(T)false) to the standard normal domain (UboldRotD50Sbolda,boldTar(T)) using Equation ().…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is based on a modulated and filtered white-noise process and can be used to generate ground motion time series for given Event Parameters. The work of Rezaeian and Der Kiureghian (2012) was extended by Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian (2018) to simulate near-fault time series. To account for the directivity effects observed in near-fault ground motions, this site-based model generates both pulse-like and non-pulse-like ground motions using the pulse probability model by Shahi and Baker (2014).…”
Section: Drd Ground Motion Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have turned to simulated ground motions for performance-based earthquake engineering applications. For example, a Caltrans research team (Yoon et al, 2019) used the concept of Probabilistic Damage Control Application (PDCA) to analyze bridge structures using a site-based ground motion simulation model developed by Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian (2018). The study used the Event Parameters of the top three contributing rupture sources to simulate ground motions and then either conduct point scaling to match S a ( T 1 ) of the UHS or use a range scaling method to match S a ( T 1 ± 1 s) of the UHS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%