1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00133-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of multi-step sheet metal forming processes by a static explicit FEM code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in higher computational times. However, for complex geometries involving complex strain-paths solid elements give more accurate results [45]. For instance, solid elements are required for accuracy in FE springback simulation when the ratio between the tool radius and blank thickness is lower than 5 [46].…”
Section: Integration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in higher computational times. However, for complex geometries involving complex strain-paths solid elements give more accurate results [45]. For instance, solid elements are required for accuracy in FE springback simulation when the ratio between the tool radius and blank thickness is lower than 5 [46].…”
Section: Integration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements were strongly supported by new innovative forming processes, for example, forming of tailor-welded blanks [8], hydroforming, etc., and they are absolutely essential for multi-stage forming processes [9], too.…”
Section: Finite Element Simulation In Metal Formingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, since the stress distribution at bottom dead center determines the deformation of the product after stress release. For accurate simulation of the contact state, it is effective to reduce the space discretization error due to the finite element (FE) and to select an appropriate contact model [5,6]. However, in general, calculation using the analysis condition to decrease discretization errors increases the computation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%