The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of mineral dust aerosol with Piecewise Log-normal Approximation (PLA) in CanAM4-PAM

Abstract: Abstract.A new size-resolved dust scheme based on the numerical method of piecewise log-normal approximation (PLA) was developed and implemented in the fourth generation of the Canadian Atmospheric Global Climate Model with the PLA Aerosol Model (CanAM4-PAM). The total simulated annual global dust emission is 2500 Tg yr −1 , and the dust mass load is 19.3 Tg for year 2000. Both are consistent with estimates from other models. Results from simulations are compared with multiple surface measurements near and awa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, considerable uncertainties still exist in the simulation of the dust cycle and its interactions with climate [Forster et al, 2007;Huneeus et al, 2011;Boucher et al, 2013]. Large biases have been found in the simulated dust concentrations, deposition fluxes, and dust optical depth [e.g., Huneeus et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2012a;Peng et al, 2012;Evan et al, 2014;Parajuli et al, 2016a]. As pointed out in these studies, a key source of the model biases lies in the parameterization of dust emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considerable uncertainties still exist in the simulation of the dust cycle and its interactions with climate [Forster et al, 2007;Huneeus et al, 2011;Boucher et al, 2013]. Large biases have been found in the simulated dust concentrations, deposition fluxes, and dust optical depth [e.g., Huneeus et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2012a;Peng et al, 2012;Evan et al, 2014;Parajuli et al, 2016a]. As pointed out in these studies, a key source of the model biases lies in the parameterization of dust emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other possible explanation is that our model may also have less scavenging for large dust particles, and this induces an incorrect dust size distribution over the outflow regions. SPRINTARS uses a single-moment scheme to track only the dust mass in 10 bins, as compared to the two-moment dust model that also includes the size distribution (Adams and Seinfeld, 2002;Peng et al, 2012). Although the underestimation of AE is further enlarged when using the clear-sky results, especially over the NAM and ASA regions, R is generally improved.…”
Section: Comparisons With Aeronet Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are either prescribed empirically or calculated explicitly in global climate aerosol models (Kinne et al, 2006;Textor et al, 2007;Peng et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012b;Mann et al, 2014), and the uncertainties of such parameters can induce significant differences in the simulated aerosol optical properties (Goto et al, 2011b). Aerosol modeling also suffers from poorly known aerosol life cycles and emission inventories (Textor et al, 2006(Textor et al, , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other differences between CanAM4 and CanAM4.2 that are relevant to this study are the introduction of an aerosol microphysics scheme (von Salzen, 2006;Ma et al, 2008;Peng et al, 2012), a higher vertical resolution in the upper troposphere, a reduced solar constant (1361 W m −2 ), and an improved treatment of the solar continuum used in the radiative transfer. However, the model retains the same T63 spectral resolution, with 49 vertical levels.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%