2015
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Metabolic Drug-Drug Interactions Perpetrated by Fluvoxamine Using Hybridized Two-Compartment Hepatic Drug-Pool-Based Tube Modeling and Estimation of In Vivo Inhibition Constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a drug is only metabolised by a single CYP (a mono-CYP substrate), meaning having a high fmCYP of more than 80%, there is a high risk for a DDI. Examples of this are the DDIs between ramelteon and fluvoxamine for CYP1A2 (Iga, 2015), and midazolam and ketoconazole for CYP3A4 (Olkkola et al, 1994) with substrate systemic (Gibbons et al, 2015)). The lowest risk of a DDI is linked to an fmCYP of less than 25% (representing a minor pathway), whereby regulatory guidelines recommend that clinical DDI studies are not required for these drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a drug is only metabolised by a single CYP (a mono-CYP substrate), meaning having a high fmCYP of more than 80%, there is a high risk for a DDI. Examples of this are the DDIs between ramelteon and fluvoxamine for CYP1A2 (Iga, 2015), and midazolam and ketoconazole for CYP3A4 (Olkkola et al, 1994) with substrate systemic (Gibbons et al, 2015)). The lowest risk of a DDI is linked to an fmCYP of less than 25% (representing a minor pathway), whereby regulatory guidelines recommend that clinical DDI studies are not required for these drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This magnitude of DDI had been deemed to be difficult to predict by any methods until we devised the mechanism. 13) The AUCR predicted by either a static method [constant unbound inhibitor (I u )-based method] as shown below, or a dynamic method (time-dependent I u -based method) employing physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, wherein the well-stirred model was applied for the hepatic extraction kinetics, was no more than 5. 4) Typically, the value of AUCR estimated by a well-stirred model-based static method * To whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Unusualness Of Ramelteon (Ram)-victimizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] Thus, the present review focuses on our achievements in DDI prediction by use of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent research by the authors [3][4][5][6][7] revealed that the unusually large DDI was caused by the very low hepatic availability (Fh) of ramelteon, and derived the theory using the tube-based hepatic extraction model, that the magnitude of the interaction (AUCR) is determined by the overall enzymatic inhibitory activity produced by DDI (Ai,overall) and Fh of the victim drug as: AUCR = [1/Fh -1]/[exp{-Ln(Fh)/Ai,overall} -1]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%