2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0257(00)00089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of melt spinning including flow-induced crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
123
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Duplay et al [31] showed that the growth rate increased during shear and correlated with molecular weight. The largest deviation (ten times higher than in quiescent conditions) was found for a high molecular weight with a broad molecular weight distribution (M w = 375 kg/mol [13] FB; D four roll mill HDPE Doufas et al [55] PB melt spinning PA Duplay et al [31] OM fiber pull out iPP Göschel et al [56] WAXS contraction cell iPP Jerschow and Janeschitz-Kriegl [26,27] PB; TEM; OM slit flow cell iPP Kumaraswamy et al [57] PB; OM slit flow cell iPP Kumaraswamy et al [30] WAXS; TEM; OM slit flow cell iPP Liedauer et al [25] PB; TEM; OM slit flow cell iPP Mackley et al [24] WAXS; FB MPR HDPE Masubuchi et al [58] SAOS/DTA SFTR iPP Monasse [28] OM fiber pull out iPP Monasse [59] OM parallel plate LMDPE Pogodina et al [60] SAOS; DSC cone plate rheometry iPP Ryan et al [61] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning iPP; PET; HDPE Samon et al [4] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning PB1 Samon et al [62] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning HDPE; PVDF Schultz et al [3] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning HDPE; PVDF; PA6 Somani et al [63] SAXS; TEM parallel plate iPP Tribout et al [23] OM parallel plate; fiber pull out EPBC Vleeshouwers and Meijer [29] SAOS cone plate rheometry iPP and MWD = 3.2). Also Tribout et al [23] showed a shear dependent growth rate.…”
Section: Measurement Of Flow-induced Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Duplay et al [31] showed that the growth rate increased during shear and correlated with molecular weight. The largest deviation (ten times higher than in quiescent conditions) was found for a high molecular weight with a broad molecular weight distribution (M w = 375 kg/mol [13] FB; D four roll mill HDPE Doufas et al [55] PB melt spinning PA Duplay et al [31] OM fiber pull out iPP Göschel et al [56] WAXS contraction cell iPP Jerschow and Janeschitz-Kriegl [26,27] PB; TEM; OM slit flow cell iPP Kumaraswamy et al [57] PB; OM slit flow cell iPP Kumaraswamy et al [30] WAXS; TEM; OM slit flow cell iPP Liedauer et al [25] PB; TEM; OM slit flow cell iPP Mackley et al [24] WAXS; FB MPR HDPE Masubuchi et al [58] SAOS/DTA SFTR iPP Monasse [28] OM fiber pull out iPP Monasse [59] OM parallel plate LMDPE Pogodina et al [60] SAOS; DSC cone plate rheometry iPP Ryan et al [61] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning iPP; PET; HDPE Samon et al [4] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning PB1 Samon et al [62] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning HDPE; PVDF Schultz et al [3] WAXS + SAXS melt spinning HDPE; PVDF; PA6 Somani et al [63] SAXS; TEM parallel plate iPP Tribout et al [23] OM parallel plate; fiber pull out EPBC Vleeshouwers and Meijer [29] SAOS cone plate rheometry iPP and MWD = 3.2). Also Tribout et al [23] showed a shear dependent growth rate.…”
Section: Measurement Of Flow-induced Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, the expression adopted by Zuidema et al (2001), using their parameter values, predicts an unrealistic value (too low) of the hardening for a fully crystallized polymer (for n g = 1, C (Zuidema et al) is of the order of tens). Doufas et al (2000), used the same formula, but with their choice of parameters, for n g = 1, C (Doufas et al) is very large, of the order of 10 26 .…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A one-phase crystallization model was selected for predicting the crystallization kinetics in spinline [1][2][3][10][11][12]. Dimensionless governing equations for fiber spinning process are expressed as follows.…”
Section: Governing Equations For Spinning Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, many researchers in academia and industry have explored the stability and sensitivity issues in this process for the enhanced control of product quality and processability during the past four decades [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Stability studies have mainly focused on the draw resonance phenomenon which is distinguished by the self-sustained periodic oscillation of spinline variables like spinline cross-sectional area and spinline tension over the critical onsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%