Simulation of germanium detector calibration using the Monte Carlo method: comparison between point and surface source models

Abstract

Simulation of detector calibration using the Monte Carlo method is very convenient. The computational calibration procedure using the MCNP code was validated by comparing results of the simulation with laboratory measurements. The standard source used for this validation was a disc-shaped filter where fission and activation products were deposited. Some discrepancies between the MCNP results and laboratory measurements were attributed to the point source model adopted. In this paper, the standard source has been simulated using both point and surface source models. Results from both models are compared with each other as well as with experimental measurements. Two variables, namely, the collimator diameter and detector-source distance have been considered in the comparison analysis. The disc model is seen to be a better model as expected. However, the point source model is good for large collimator diameter and also when the distance from detector to source increases, although for smaller sizes of the collimator and lower distances a surface source model is necessary.

Monte-Carlo simulations of the full-energy-peak efficiency for a broad-energy germanium detector—a comparison between GEANT4 and FLUKA

“…Traditionally, the response of a HPGe detector for gamma/X-rays is determined empirically using radioactive sources of known activities. In recent years, there is a growing trend in utilizing Monte-Carlo simulations to study properties related to the detection and quantification of gamma/X-ray by radiation detectors, including detection efficiency, cascade summing effect, evaluation of detector internal dimensions, impact of shielding materials over the MDA, optimization of detector configuration and the full reconstruction of a gamma-ray spectrum [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The main advantages of using numerical calculations are versatility, reduced cost and avoiding the risks associated with handing of radioactive materials.…”

Dependence of NaI(Tl) detector intrinsic efficiency on source-detector distance, energy and off-axis distance: Their implications for radioactivity measurements

“…Based on their studies, they suggested that for good photon detection the ratio of source-detector distance (d) to detector radius (R) should be less than 0.01. It should be noted at this point that from the point of view of radiation protection these criteria cannot be justified in certain circumstances, for instance, when the area to be monitored presents high background radiation level or contaminated by sources of high radiation level [6,7]. Radiation protection regulation requires that exposure of radiation to personnel should be kept as low as reasonably achievable.…”

Study of a New Design of P-N Semiconductor Detector Array for Nuclear Medicine Imaging by Monte Carlo Simulation Codes

“…(2005). [10] This tally with Gaussian energy broadening code can resembles the output simulation pulse of the detector from photons with energy E through three various factors a, b, and c.[11] Relation between full width at half maximum (FWHM) and these factors are defined as ;[12] therefore, these factors can be achieved measuring FWHM of a detector at least for three different sources.…”