1995
DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(95)00029-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of ecological, social and economic factors in agricultural systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Land change science (LCS) addresses interactions among social systems and environmental factors regarding the behaviour of households or firms as the major proximate drivers of land change (Turner et al 2007). Agricultural sciences consider change in agricultural land-use in relation to farming systems viewed as adaptive socio-technological systems driven by land condition, household behaviour, technology, socio-economic environment and public policy (Deffontaines et al 1995;Dent et al 1995;Gibon 1999;Bontkes and van Keulen 2003). We combined concepts and methods from these scientific domains to address landscape changes in the Pyrenees by means of a case study.…”
Section: Overview Of the Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land change science (LCS) addresses interactions among social systems and environmental factors regarding the behaviour of households or firms as the major proximate drivers of land change (Turner et al 2007). Agricultural sciences consider change in agricultural land-use in relation to farming systems viewed as adaptive socio-technological systems driven by land condition, household behaviour, technology, socio-economic environment and public policy (Deffontaines et al 1995;Dent et al 1995;Gibon 1999;Bontkes and van Keulen 2003). We combined concepts and methods from these scientific domains to address landscape changes in the Pyrenees by means of a case study.…”
Section: Overview Of the Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capturing uncertainties inherent in sustainability assessment, especially ex ante 2. More realistically integrating the decision-maker's own views, since they are not necessarily expressed with formal, quantitative models (Dent et al 1995;Munda 2005); 3. Handling incomparability, incommensurability, and noncompensation between sustainability dimensions more effectively than other, more "classic" MCDA approaches frequently used to assess sustainability, such as ELEC TRE (Loyce et al 2002;Mazzetto and Bonera 2003), AHP (Shrestha et al 2004) or multi-objective optimization models (Dogliotti et al 2004;Meyer-Aurich 2005).…”
Section: Model Dissemination and Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical scientists thus recognised that both the bio-physical and the socioeconomic components of a farm need to be considered, highlighting the usefulness of an interdisciplinary, systemic and gender-sensitive analysis (Hart and Pinchinat, 1982;Biggs, 1985;Jiggins and Röling, 1994;Dent et al, 1995) (see Tab. I).…”
Section: Applying Systems Thinking To Farmingmentioning
confidence: 99%