2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-019-2100-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of double buffer layer on CIGS solar cell with SCAPS software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, J sc linearly decreases with the bandgap of CIGS ( Figure 3 b). The short-circuit current ( I sc ) is calculated according to the following equations [ 36 ]: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, J sc linearly decreases with the bandgap of CIGS ( Figure 3 b). The short-circuit current ( I sc ) is calculated according to the following equations [ 36 ]: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from that, the thickness of the buffer layer is varied from 20 nm to 100 nm to observe the behavior and optimized to 50 nm for maximum efficiency. The Input parameters for device simulation were adopted from the experimental results, literature as well as self-ascribed [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] . 18 3.1×10 18 3.1×10 18 VB Density of States (cm -3 ) 1.1×10 19 1.5×10 19 1.8×10 19 1.8×10 19 1.8×10…”
Section: Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu2O [44] CIGS [45] ZnSe [45] i-ZnO [45] n+ZnO [45] Thickness Here with the lower thickness of the CdS layer, QE is higher as compared to higher thickness at the same wavelength. Fig.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%