2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-002-0153-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of detonation wave interaction using an ignition and growth model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results for the particle pressure and particle velocity in the detonating explosive, plotted in Fig. 5, show good agreement with published experimental values [10,11] for the von Neumann spike pressure (25.9 GPa) and particle velocity (2,310 m/s) in detonating TNT. …”
Section: Example Simulationssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results for the particle pressure and particle velocity in the detonating explosive, plotted in Fig. 5, show good agreement with published experimental values [10,11] for the von Neumann spike pressure (25.9 GPa) and particle velocity (2,310 m/s) in detonating TNT. …”
Section: Example Simulationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this case, the velocity field in the vicinity of the wall is initialized to 5.6 km/s [10]. The simulation assumes JWL equations of state for the solid reactant and 080006-3 gas product, and an 'ignition and growth' model for the explosive (both are taken from the published literature [11]). The simulation results for the particle pressure and particle velocity in the detonating explosive, plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Example Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of an impact sending a shock into the explosive material was the scenario used and is depicted in Figure 107. This is patterned after the flyer plate problem that has been used to test the ignition-growth model in cutter [12]. Here a slug of air is used to impact the explosive since no constitutive models for inerts have been integrated into the current modeling framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate these cases, the JWL equation of state was used for the unreacted explosive material and the detonation products with the parameters in Table 1. The first simulation cases used the ignition and growth model by [23] and demonstrated by [12]. The parameters for the reaction are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HE detonation model used is a prescription type model as described in [13], which is the most common class of model used in hydrocodes. In short, a prescription model pre-maps the computational cells that lay within the explosive to determine the time at which the detonation front will arrive at their particular location.…”
Section: Explosive Source Termmentioning
confidence: 99%