2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery in Jharia coalfields, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that for CO 2 to flood the CBM reservoir and sweep out the methane, the coal seams should have a moderate to high permeability (at least 1 mD) that may limit the commercial application of ECBM techniques in many coal fields. The technical feasibility of CO 2 driven ECBM has been studied through numerical modeling and simulation studies in Jharia and Raniganj coalfields (Vishal et al, 2013;Vishal et al, 2018). The simulation studies show that 218 Mm 3 of CO 2 can be sequestered in place of 74 Mm 3 of methane produced from chosen dimensions of Raniganj coalfields and approximately 220 Mm 3 of CO 2 can be sequestered in place of 62 Mm 3 methane in Jharia coal fields.…”
Section: Extraction Of Coal Bed Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that for CO 2 to flood the CBM reservoir and sweep out the methane, the coal seams should have a moderate to high permeability (at least 1 mD) that may limit the commercial application of ECBM techniques in many coal fields. The technical feasibility of CO 2 driven ECBM has been studied through numerical modeling and simulation studies in Jharia and Raniganj coalfields (Vishal et al, 2013;Vishal et al, 2018). The simulation studies show that 218 Mm 3 of CO 2 can be sequestered in place of 74 Mm 3 of methane produced from chosen dimensions of Raniganj coalfields and approximately 220 Mm 3 of CO 2 can be sequestered in place of 62 Mm 3 methane in Jharia coal fields.…”
Section: Extraction Of Coal Bed Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of safety, the gas environment was CO 2 and the gas pressure was 3 MPa.Condition 2: By keeping σ Y and σ Z unchanged, σ X was raised to 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 MPa.Condition 3: By keeping σ X and σ Z unchanged, σ Y was reduced to 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20 and 15 MPa.Condition 4: Z -direction loading, X -direction unloading, Y -direction loading and Z -direction unloading, were continued as described in Conditions 2 and 3. When loaded or unloaded in one direction, the force was kept constant in the other two directions.It is true that CO 2 adsorption will cause the coal matrix swelling [21,22]. Hence, the total strain and permeability of the coal are affected by CO 2 adsorption.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that CO 2 adsorption will cause the coal matrix swelling [21,22]. Hence, the total strain and permeability of the coal are affected by CO 2 adsorption.…”
Section: Experimental Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been carried out on ECBM through experiments and numerical simulations [7][8][9][10]. When CO 2 is pressurized into coal seams, gas transport mainly includes diffusion, seepage, and competitive adsorption [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%