1992
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90081-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of canopy fluorescence as a function of canopy structure and leaf fluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between leaf and canopy fluorescence parameters could be further investigated through the use of a simple model taking into account leaf fluorescence profile inside the canopy, structural variations of the canopy, and background reflection [81]. Such information can be useful to evaluate the possibility to use the proposed method in conjunction with remote sensing fluorescence measurements obtained from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) [82], aerial or satellite remote sensing [83,84].…”
Section: Implications For Practical Application and Future Research Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between leaf and canopy fluorescence parameters could be further investigated through the use of a simple model taking into account leaf fluorescence profile inside the canopy, structural variations of the canopy, and background reflection [81]. Such information can be useful to evaluate the possibility to use the proposed method in conjunction with remote sensing fluorescence measurements obtained from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) [82], aerial or satellite remote sensing [83,84].…”
Section: Implications For Practical Application and Future Research Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of the fluorescence signal at canopy level depends on the photosynthetic rates, biophysical, biochemical and structural characteristics of the canopy, incoming radiation and background contributions (Cerovic et al, 1996;Damm, Guanter, Paul-Limoges et al, 2015;Damm, Guanter, Verhoef et al, 2015;Daumard et al, 2010;Fournier et al, 2012;Hoge, Swift, & Yungel, 1983;Moya, Daumard, Moise, Ounis, & Goulas, 2006;Olioso, M ethy, & Lacaze, 1992;Rossini et al, 2016;Van Wittenberghe et al, 2013;Verrelst et al, 2015). These parameters are highly variable in space and time and they should all be considered to correctly interpret the fluorescence signal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the relationships found are not universally applied, and it has been suggested that C 3 and C 4 plants dissipation mechanisms are different due to the contribution of other processes to electron use in C 3 plants (Lichtenthaler et al 1998 ;Flexas et al 2000 ) . Actually, not only the carbon fi xation mechanism but also leaf roughness and thickness and the vegetation structure are in fl uencing the fl uorescence signal (Rosema et al 1991 ;Olioso et al 1992 ;Moya et al 2006 ) .…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In particular, as an attempt to minimize structural effects, indices related to fl uorescence emission bands located in the red and far red have been proposed to assess the relationship between apparent re fl ectance and chlorophyll fl uorescence at both leaf and canopy levels (Olioso et al 1992 ;Zarco-Tejada et al 2000a, b ) . It has been suggested that while changes in chlorophyll fl uorescence emission in the red are related to nutrient stress leading to lower chlorophyll content, blue/red and blue/near-infrared fl uorescence ratios are sensitive to abiotic stress (Lichtenthaler et al 1998 ) .…”
Section: Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%