2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of asymmetric effects for shape memory alloys by decomposition of transformation strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a key shortcoming common to the aforementioned models is that they cannot describe the compressive thermo-mechanical behavior of SMAs. Although several researchers have attempted to account for the compressive behavior, there were some differences in the behavior between the numerical and the experimental results (Auricchio et al, 2009;Baeta-Neves et al, 2004;Mahnken and Wilmanns, 2008;Paiva et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, a key shortcoming common to the aforementioned models is that they cannot describe the compressive thermo-mechanical behavior of SMAs. Although several researchers have attempted to account for the compressive behavior, there were some differences in the behavior between the numerical and the experimental results (Auricchio et al, 2009;Baeta-Neves et al, 2004;Mahnken and Wilmanns, 2008;Paiva et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…An asymmetry between tension and compression has been found for material like SMA, this effect is also called SD-effect for "strength differential effect" [2], [3] and [4]. This effect appears clearly on the surface at the initiation transformation from austenite to martensite under proportional loading.…”
Section: Taking Into Account the Asymmetry Between Tension And Comprementioning
confidence: 93%
“…It could also be dependent on additional strain tensors, which eventually results into the use of back stress tensors, as discussed, e.g. in Wolff et al [51] and Mahnken and Wilmanns [31]. Using the additive decomposition (2.1) and the identity ∂ /∂C e :Ċ e = 2(C e · ∂ /∂C e ) : L e the Clausius-Duham inequality (3) with quantities with respect to the intermediate configuration results into…”
Section: Dissipation Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the case, that the transformation yield function satisfies ϕ = 0 the Lagrangian multiplier related to phase transformationμ is said to be driven by the strain rate L, the rate of martensite volume fractionż and the temperature rateθ occurring in Eq. (31). This strain-temperature-martensite induced formulation can however be rewritten as a stress-temperature-induced formulation, where again for illustrative purpose we restrict to the case of phase transformation, and in this way neglecting plasticity effects.…”
Section: Consistency Conditions and Lagrangian Multipliersmentioning
confidence: 98%