1982
DOI: 10.1002/nag.1610060306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of air storage aquifer by finite element model

Abstract: SUMMARYA finite element model is developed to simulate the behaviour of an aquifer used as storage space for a compressed air energy storage (CAES) system. The governing equations describing a two-phase flow of air and water are coupled non-linear partial differential equations and are solved by the Galerkin approach. The resulting computer model is applied to a gas percolation problem. Upon verification of the numerical results, the model is employed to simulate the air-water displacement in a storage reservo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, some of the important work in the early development of 6 the theoretical foundations for aquifer CAES was done by leaders in natural gas storage (e.g., Katz and Lady 1976). And hydrologists contributed to the analysis of the feasibility and design of aquifer CAES through early modeling studies (Meiri and Karadi 1982;Braester and Bear 1984) and more recent analytical solutions (Kushnir et al 2010).…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, some of the important work in the early development of 6 the theoretical foundations for aquifer CAES was done by leaders in natural gas storage (e.g., Katz and Lady 1976). And hydrologists contributed to the analysis of the feasibility and design of aquifer CAES through early modeling studies (Meiri and Karadi 1982;Braester and Bear 1984) and more recent analytical solutions (Kushnir et al 2010).…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many outstanding issues remain to be addressed before PM-CAES can be considered established technology. We take the kinds of issues studied by Meiri and Karadi (1982) and Braester and Bear (1984) and Kushnir et al (2010) involving detailed consideration of what goes on in the porous media with respect to fluid flow, heat flow, and mass transfer during CAES cycling as our point of departure from prior work. Specifically, our investigation focuses entirely on the subsurface part of the aquifer or depleted reservoir CAES system, ignores the surface infrastructure of compressors, motor-generators, and turbines, but includes detailed consideration of the well and reservoir.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it was shown that for certain operating conditions and reservoir characteristics, water can enter the well. Meiri and Karadi (1982) developed a numerical model for similar conditions (two-phase, two-dimensional, singlewell) but subject to a daily cycle. They examined reservoir permeability effects and found that the air-water displacement is strongly infl uenced by it.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Fl Ow In Aquifersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, no quantitative data on the critical flow rate have been reported. Additionally, excluding the study of Meiri and Karadi (1982), all other investigations addressed only the first cycle solution, to minimize computation cost. Therefore, there exists a need for explicit formulae that cover a wide range of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it was shown that for certain operating conditions and reservoir characteristics, water can enter the well. Meiri and Karadi (1982) developed a numerical model for similar conditions (two phase, two dimensional, single well), but subject to a daily cycle. They examined reservoir permeability effects and found that the air-water displacement is strongly influenced by it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%