2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14216330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of 3D Electrochemical Phase Formation: Mixed Growth Control

Abstract: Processes of nucleation and growth largely determine the structure and properties of thin films obtained by electrodeposition on foreign substrates. Theoretical aspects of the initial stages of electrochemical phase formation under constant and variable overpotentials are considered in this work. Simulation of multiple nucleation with mixed (charge transfer, and diffusion) controlled growth was performed for three cases (cyclic voltammetry, potentiostatic electrodeposition, and galvanostatic electrodeposition)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrocrystallization parameter values were close to those for silver electrodeposition from the AgNO 3 -KNO 3 -NaNO 3 melt ( c Ag+ = 0.0166 M) [ 53 ]: T = 523 K, z = 1, υ = 1.7 × 10 −23 cm 3 , σ = 1 × 10 −5 J cm −2 , D = 1 × 10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , c 0 = 1 × 10 19 cm −3 . It was shown experimentally [ 46 , 53 ] and theoretically [ 54 ] for this system that, in a wide range of overpotentials, the rate of the charge transfer stage affects the kinetics of the nucleus growth only at the very initial stage, when the nucleus size is close to the critical one. The contributions of side processes, including surface diffusion, are also negligible [ 53 , 55 ], so this system is the most suitable for studying diffusion-controlled growth.…”
Section: Model and Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrocrystallization parameter values were close to those for silver electrodeposition from the AgNO 3 -KNO 3 -NaNO 3 melt ( c Ag+ = 0.0166 M) [ 53 ]: T = 523 K, z = 1, υ = 1.7 × 10 −23 cm 3 , σ = 1 × 10 −5 J cm −2 , D = 1 × 10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , c 0 = 1 × 10 19 cm −3 . It was shown experimentally [ 46 , 53 ] and theoretically [ 54 ] for this system that, in a wide range of overpotentials, the rate of the charge transfer stage affects the kinetics of the nucleus growth only at the very initial stage, when the nucleus size is close to the critical one. The contributions of side processes, including surface diffusion, are also negligible [ 53 , 55 ], so this system is the most suitable for studying diffusion-controlled growth.…”
Section: Model and Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with works investigating the influence of various factors (multi-stage process and mixed growth control [59,60,62,63], growth controlled by diffusion in a layer of finite thickness [64][65][66], and the migration effect [67][68][69]) on the current response under potentiostatic or potentiodynamic conditions indicates the need to consider combinations of these effects. Therefore, we used numerical simulation for a more detailed study of the mechanism and kinetics of deposit formation/dissolution in this system.…”
Section: Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the macroscale dimension inevitably affects the profile and microstructure when the characteristic size of pattern is decreased to a level comparable to grain size. [16,17] Likely, it has been reported that the fluid fields in the middle and top surface of through silicon vias with different aspect ratios were different even under the same electroplating condition, which eventually led to different filling performances. [18] The difference of filling profile and microstructure induced by the macroscopic dimensions of pattern is called the size effect of electrocrystallization, which has rarely been studied previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%