Langley, Simon, Bradshaw, and Zytkow (1987) conceived of scientific discovery as a search through a space of possible models for those that explain what we observe about nature. Modern scientists are obviously conducting this search collaboratively, both within teams and across the wider scientific community. There are many interesting questions one could ask about the dynamics of science as a collaborative process. Of particular interest is the appearance over the past 15 years of self-publishing web technologies, such as forums and blogs. These technologies offer the enticing possibility of scientists publishing their own articles instead of having to wait for peer review. In the extreme, one can even imagine scientists putting their laboratory notebooks online. In previous work (Shrager, Billman, Convertino, Massar, & Pirolli 2009), my coworkers and I coined the term Soccer Science and argued that the always-on, uncensored, instantaneous, free, and ubiquitous nature of web publishing technology is (metaphorically) changing science from an (American) "football" model to a "soccer" model. Football Science is the science with which most people are familiar: Teams (usually laboratories, or sometimes larger collaborative groups) plan and experiment more or less independently; publish results through the long, narrow, quality-controlled publication cycle; and usually have the need or opportunity to reconsider their work versus that of other teams only at "breaks in the play"-that is, when a relevant article appears in a journal. The publication cycle dominates Football Science and enables the teams to engage in a somewhat leisurely read-plan-experiment-publish cycle. Shrager et al. ( 2009) contrasted this with the new world of Soccer Science, in which communication is continuous and interleaved with scientific work. In a Soccer Science world, instead of running many experiments and then pushing some results through a structured, peer-reviewed publishing cycle, researchers could self-publish their articles on the Web without peer review and could even publish unedited laboratory notebooks or raw data. In a Soccer Science world, one's work would have to be reconsidered on an almost literally continuous basis.Just as soccer places a much greater cognitive load on each individual player than does football, and presumably leads to different strategies that involve greater satisficing, one would expect Soccer Scientists to experience a much greater planning load and to use strategies that satisfice much more extensively.