1983
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/16/11/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation experiments on unipolar arcs

Abstract: A plasma source is described which produces a plasma beam with a density ne=1013 cm-3 and a temperature of 5-25 eV, 50 cm outside the actual discharge. In this plasma unipolar arcs are ignited without applying an external voltage. It is shown that by plasma cleaning of the surface this type of arcing can be completely suppressed for the above stated parameters. A microcontamination deliberately attached to a wall probe of stainless steel enables one to predetermine the ignition point of a unipolar arc, and giv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DiMES surface has even higher than the floor ring arcing threshold at ∼3 MW/m 2 . This is probably because the DiMES sample did not experience disruptions and thus avoided surface contamination which could lead to increased arcing rates as in [18]. This argument is supported by the observation that in a series of discharges following disruptions the arcing rate increased on the floor ring to 0.4 cm −2 at q ⊥ =3.6 MW/m 2 and on the shelf to 0.3 cm −2 at q ⊥ =2.6 MW/m 2 , see Fig.…”
Section: In Situ Arc Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DiMES surface has even higher than the floor ring arcing threshold at ∼3 MW/m 2 . This is probably because the DiMES sample did not experience disruptions and thus avoided surface contamination which could lead to increased arcing rates as in [18]. This argument is supported by the observation that in a series of discharges following disruptions the arcing rate increased on the floor ring to 0.4 cm −2 at q ⊥ =3.6 MW/m 2 and on the shelf to 0.3 cm −2 at q ⊥ =2.6 MW/m 2 , see Fig.…”
Section: In Situ Arc Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plate potential increases, approaching that of the plasma, to ensure that the excess electron current returns to the surface of the plate. A unipolar arc has been extensively studied in attempts at direct observation of this unique phenomenon [5][6][7]. The necessary condition for forming a unipolar arc, given by Robson and Thonemann, is presented as a solid curve for a helium plasma with tungsten plate (figure 1) [8], where A is the area of the plate exposed to the plasma, n e the plasma density and T e the electron temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since the arcing takes place accidentally in fusion experiments, special model experiments have been conducted for a systematic study, using plasmas generated by a high-frequency discharge [8,9], a laser beam [10] and a plasma gun [11]. However, the observation of a comprehensive unipolar arc, using a single electrode set in a stationary plasma, has never been reported in laboratory experiments, probably because the ignition of arcing requires a totally different condition from that for sustaining stationary arcing which was shown by R&T. In fact, in [9], it is reported that arcing on a clean surface could be completely suppressed even when the product An e T 1/2 e , where A is the electrode area and n e and T e are the electron density and temperature, respectively, was 100 times larger than R&T's threshold value, which corresponds to the necessary condition for stationary arcing, obtained from the following relation [2]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%