2012 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1109/rws.2012.6175340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation evaluation of tag movement direction estimation methods in RFID gate systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first systems employed more than one antenna to estimate the crossing direction of assets by processing the detection information and the RSSI measurements. In [ 22 ], a method was proposed that uses the difference in the crossing time of two antennas aligned along the gate crossing direction without additional external sensors. In [ 23 ], a similar method was proposed relying on active RFID tags and based on creating different interrogation zones for each antenna.…”
Section: Rfid Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first systems employed more than one antenna to estimate the crossing direction of assets by processing the detection information and the RSSI measurements. In [ 22 ], a method was proposed that uses the difference in the crossing time of two antennas aligned along the gate crossing direction without additional external sensors. In [ 23 ], a similar method was proposed relying on active RFID tags and based on creating different interrogation zones for each antenna.…”
Section: Rfid Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost and the encumbrance are lower than the shielded gates, but the cost of the antenna panel is not negligible and must be considered when taking into account the system scalability. The systems proposed in [ 22 , 23 , 24 ] have been evaluated as “Low–Medium Cost”, “Low–Medium Encumbrance” and “Medium–High Scalability”. Indeed, the three systems require two antennas, which increase the cost with respect to solutions with a single antenna, and the encumbrance cannot be considered as “low”, too, as it is required to find enough space for two antennas.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although effective, those solutions require extra space, cost and complexity, which in case of using cameras may also raise privacy concerns. Another solution employed the signature captured from different reader antennas to estimate the movement direction of tagged goods [10]. Other authors proposed the use of low-level parameters extracted from the reader measurements such as the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or the timestamps indicating when the data were acquired [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of cameras may raise privacy issues. Other solutions employ more than one antenna to estimate the motion direction of the goods by comparing the signature of tagged items measured from each antenna [6] or creating different interrogation zones [7]. Keller et al [8] suggest to use various aggregated features based on the lowlevel reader data (Electronic Product Code, Received Signal Strength Indicator -RSSI, timestamp, reading antenna) to discriminate moving tags in forklift truck applications, with multiple antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%