Simulation-Based Traceability Analysis of RFID Authentication Protocols

Alagheband, Mahdi R.; Aref, Mohammad Reza

doi:10.1007/s11277-013-1552-7

Cited by 18 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Simple-weight algorithms use hash functions that are also not feasible for passive tag resources. Lightweight algorithms use simple one-way hash functions, cyclic redundancy checks, and pseudo-random number generators [ 10 ]. Finally, ultra-lightweight algorithms use bitwise operations, which can be performed at low cost.…”

Section: Review Of Recent Rfid Authentication Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fernando and Abawajy [ 22 ] proposed a mutual authentication protocol for Networked RFID Systems NRS, which is a lightweight mutual authentication scheme for an RFID system using low operations such as excusive or operation (XOR) and one-way hash functions. However, Alagheband and Aref [ 10 ] reported NRS to be vulnerable to major attacks and specifically a full disclosure attack that compromises the whole RFID system. Alagheband and Aref improved NRS protocol and proposed NRS+ by adding three more hash functions to the authentication message to increase the system security.…”

Section: Review Of Recent Rfid Authentication Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Survey on Prominent RFID Authentication Protocols for Passive Tags

Baashirah

Abuzneid

2018

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is one of the leading technologies in the Internet of Things (IoT) to create an efficient and reliable system to securely identify objects in many environments such as business, health, and manufacturing areas. Recent RFID authentication protocols have been proposed to satisfy the security features of RFID communication. In this article, we identify and review some of the most recent and enhanced authentication protocols that mainly focus on the authentication between a reader and a tag. However, the scope of this survey includes only passive tags protocols, due to the large scale of the RFID framework. We examined some of the recent RFID protocols in term of security requirements, computation, and attack resistance. We conclude that only five protocols resist all of the major attacks, while only one protocol satisfies all of the security requirements of the RFID system.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Recent Rfid Authentication Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Review Of Recent Rfid Authentication Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey on Prominent RFID Authentication Protocols for Passive Tags

Baashirah

Abuzneid

2018

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Various formal privacy models [14][15][16][17] are utilized to prove safety property of RFID protocol via different oracles. In this paper, we practically adopt the existing formal privacy model [18]. Thus, we enhance the model to analyze forward/backward traceability of the improved protocol with different assumptions.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this paper, we enhance the existing formal privacy Vaudenay model [18]. Thus, we practically define strong forward untraceable and backward untraceable based on Vaudenay model.…”

Section: Adversarial Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untraceable Analysis of Lightweight RFID Ownership Transfer Protocol

Chen¹,

Cao²,

Zhai³

et al. 2016

IJFGCN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, the key disclosure attack in protocol is an attack that the current messages of the tag and monitored and the current and next run's keys should be revealed by an attacker. Besides, forward and backward untraceable is introduced in [7], where the attacker run the current protocol and obtain the future and the past secret keys of the target tag.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%