Simulation-based skills training: a qualitative interview study exploring surgical trainees’ experience of stress

Abstract

Introduction Stress can affect the ability to acquire technical skills. Simulation-based training (SBT) courses allow surgical trainees to train their technical skills away from stressful clinical environments. Trainees’ subjective experiences of stress during SBT courses on laparoscopic surgery remains understudied. Here, we explored the subjective stress experiences of surgical trainees during mandatory laparoscopic SBT courses. We aimed to obtain a broader understanding of which factors of the simulation training the trainees perceived as eliciting stress. Methods A qualitative study with semistructured individual interviews was undertaken to explore trainees’ subjective experiences of stress. Twenty surgical trainees participated while attending courses at a national training center for advanced laparoscopic surgery. Questions explored trainees’ stress experiences during the SBT courses with a focus on perceived stressors related to laparoscopic simulation training on two box-trainers and one virtual reality simulator. Interview data were analyzed using inductive, qualitative content analysis methods to identify codes, categories, and themes. Results Findings indicated that trainees have a variety of stress experiences during laparoscopic SBT. Three main themes were identified to be related to stress experiences: simulation task requirements, psychomotor skill levels and internal pressures, with subcategories such as task difficulty and time requirements, unrealistic haptic feedback and realism of graphics, inconsistent and poor technical performance, and self-imposed pressures and socio-evaluative threats. Conclusions Insights into surgical trainees’ experience of stress during laparoscopic SBT courses showed that some stress experiences were directly related to simulation training, while others were of psychological nature. The technical and efficiency requirements of simulation tasks elicited stress experiences among trainees with less laparoscopic experience and lower levels of psychomotor skills. Self-imposed pressures played an integral part in how trainees mobilized and performed during the courses, suggesting that levels of stress might enhance laparoscopic simulation performance. For course facilitators aiming at optimizing future laparoscopic SBT courses, attending to the realism, providing clarity about learning objectives, and having awareness of individual differences among trainees’ technical level when designing the simulation tasks, would be beneficial. Equally important to the laparoscopic SBT is to create a psychological safe learning space in order to reduce the internal pressures of trainees.

Operating under the influence: The effect of alcohol on operative performance using a virtual robotic training platform - an experimental comparative cohort study

“…Second, data on laparoscopic pro ciency in our participants was not collected. Laparoscopic skills have been shown to translate well into robotic ability, even when participants were previously naïve to the technology [32,33]. While it is safe to assume that all participants had some prior laparoscopic experience, data comparing self-reported laparoscopic pro ciency and robotic outcomes under the in uence of alcohol would have potentially added to the discussion.…”

Low-cost model for pancreatojejunostomy simulation in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy

“…Surgical simulation training facilitates an environment free of operating room stressors, without putting patients at risk. Simulators are used for the training of basic, as well as complex, MIS procedures [18]. The limitation of virtual simulation is that often, it is unable to mimic real-life complex operative steps; as such, cadaveric and animal model workshops also exist to facilitate MIS training.…”

Pilot Evaluation of Silicone Surrogates for Oral Mucosa Simulation in Craniofacial Surgical Training

“…This financial barrier restricts the widespread adoption of high-fidelity simulators, which are essential for standardized surgical education globally [2], [28]. Moreover, establishing a systematic and ongoing feedback loop with experts is resource-intensive [29], [30]. While invaluable, coordinating regular workshops and collaborative sessions across multiple institutions and regions can be logistically challenging [2], [28].…”

“…Exploring alternative additives or materials that reduce hand strain and improve procedural efficiency could be beneficial. Incorporating advanced manufacturing techniques such as multi-material 3D printing could allow for the creation of more complex, anatomically accurate models with varying mechanical properties [14], [30]. This would provide a more realistic training experience by mimicking the heterogeneity of human tissues.…”