Simulation-Based Learning: Improving Knowledge and Clinical Judgment Within the NICU

Letcher, Deborah C.; Roth, Shelly J.; Varenhorst, Lisa J.

doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2017.03.001

Cited by 33 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…18,19 Therefore, this process is one of the essential skills that should be improved in nursing students during undergraduate education. 18,24,25 In the present study, a higher level of clinical decision-making after the clinical practice was found in students who received simulation training compared to those in the control group. This result shows that HFS increases the perception of clinical decision-making.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

“…Clinical decision‐making is a complex process that covers evaluating evidence, problem solving, knowledge enforcement, and clinical judgment 18,19 . Therefore, this process is one of the essential skills that should be improved in nursing students during undergraduate education 18,24,25 . In the present study, a higher level of clinical decision‐making after the clinical practice was found in students who received simulation training compared to those in the control group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

“…In addition, studies evaluating the use of simulation in nursing education show that the levels of clinical decision-making of nursing students are very limited. 24,25 Therefore, it is important to conduct studies that evaluate the effect of simulation on students' clinical decision-making. Moreover, the positive views of the students support the quantitative findings about the effect of simulation on their acquisition of knowledge, decision-making, and self-confidence.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This result shows that HFS increases the perception of clinical decision‐making. In addition, studies evaluating the use of simulation in nursing education show that the levels of clinical decision‐making of nursing students are very limited 24,25 . Therefore, it is important to conduct studies that evaluate the effect of simulation on students’ clinical decision‐making.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The impact of high‐fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision‐making for the management of pre‐eclampsia

Akalın

Şahin

2020

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the impact of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students' knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision-making in the management of preeclampsia, and to explore the students' views and learning experiences. Methods: A mixed-methods design study was conducted on 107 third-year nursing students. The students were randomly assigned to the control group (n=54) or the experimental group (n=53). The students in the experimental group attended the simulation training using a high-fidelity simulator, while the students in the control group attended only the classical training on "the management of pre-eclampsia." Results: Knowledge (P<0.001), critical thinking (P<0.05), and clinical decision-making (P<0.05) scores of students in the experimental group increased after the simulation. In the focus group interviews, five themes were identified: learning development; closing the gap between theory and practice; confident decision-making and self-confidence; professional preparation; and recommendations. Conclusion: High-fidelity simulation is efficacious for improving the management of pre-eclampsia among nursing students.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The impact of high‐fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision‐making for the management of pre‐eclampsia

Akalın

Şahin

2020

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They all evaluated outcome immediately after the simulated neonatal resuscitation team training intervention or within a 2-3 months period. Self-assessed improvements were reported for neonatal resuscitation knowledge (26,28,(33)(34)(35), selfe cacy (28,34), communication (33,36), and leadership, con dence and technical skills (36). Dadiz et al speci cally trained and studied delivery room communication, and interestingly the health care professionals reported signi cant improvements in team communication in real clinical situations over a 3-year study period (27).…”

Section: Results and Synthesis Of Learning (Kirkpatrick Level Ii)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Simulation-Based Neonatal Emergency Team Training on Clinical Performance and Patient Outcome: A Systematic Review

Lindhard¹,

Thim²,

Laursen³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundA number of neonatal simulation-training programmes have been deployed during the last decade, and a growing number of studies have investigated effects of simulation-based team training. However, the body of evidence remains to be compiled. Therefore, we performed a systematic review on the effects of simulation-based team training on clinical performance and patient outcome.MethodsThe review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). We included studies on team training in emergency neonatal settings with reported outcome on clinical performance and patient outcome. Two reviewers independently selected articles and assessed risk-of-bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Kirkpatricks’ model for evaluation of training programs provided the framework for a narrative synthesis.ResultsWe screened 1,434 titles and abstracts, evaluated 173 full-texts for eligibility, and included 24 studies. We identified only two studies with neonatal mortality outcome, and they had significant methodological limitations, and no conclusion could be reached regarding effects of simulation training in developed countries. Considering clinical performance, randomized studies showed improved team performance in simulated re-evaluations 3 and 6 months after the intervention.ConclusionsSimulation-based team training in neonatal resuscitation improves team performance and technical performance in simulation-based evaluations 3 to 6 months later. The current evidence was insufficient to conclude on neonatal mortality after simulation-based team training, since no studies were available from developed countries. Future research should include patient outcomes or clinical proxies of treatment quality whenever possible.

show abstract

Do Simulation Studies Measure up? A Simulation Study Quality Review

Cant

Levett‐Jones

James

2018

Clinical Simulation in Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Simulation-Based Learning: Improving Knowledge and Clinical Judgment Within the NICU

Cited by 33 publications

References 17 publications

The impact of high‐fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision‐making for the management of pre‐eclampsia

The impact of high‐fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision‐making for the management of pre‐eclampsia

The Effect of Simulation-Based Neonatal Emergency Team Training on Clinical Performance and Patient Outcome: A Systematic Review

Do Simulation Studies Measure up? A Simulation Study Quality Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About