2006
DOI: 10.1002/0470047720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation‐Based Lean Six‐Sigma and Design for Six‐Sigma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this issue, Six Sigma applications have grown to include the design and redesign of both products and services, which is known as DFSS (El-Haik & Roy, 2005). DFSS focuses on building quality into products/services by identifying what customers want/need, translating these into critical-to-quality characteristics, deploying these through specific aspects of the product/service design, and verifying that the final design appropriately addresses the original intent (i.e., to fulfill customers' needs) (Mast, Diepstraten, & Does, 2011;El-Haik & Al-Aomar, 2006;Yang & El-Haik, 2003). Previous discussions in the literature have pointed out that as there is no standard framework to guide the use of the DFSS methodology (Watson & DeYong, 2010); yet, Yang (2005) suggests that the DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, and Verify) methodology is appropriate to use when designing service processes, as it specifically addresses redesigning processes, which is a common occurrence in servicebased organizations.…”
Section: Supply Chain Improvement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, Six Sigma applications have grown to include the design and redesign of both products and services, which is known as DFSS (El-Haik & Roy, 2005). DFSS focuses on building quality into products/services by identifying what customers want/need, translating these into critical-to-quality characteristics, deploying these through specific aspects of the product/service design, and verifying that the final design appropriately addresses the original intent (i.e., to fulfill customers' needs) (Mast, Diepstraten, & Does, 2011;El-Haik & Al-Aomar, 2006;Yang & El-Haik, 2003). Previous discussions in the literature have pointed out that as there is no standard framework to guide the use of the DFSS methodology (Watson & DeYong, 2010); yet, Yang (2005) suggests that the DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, and Verify) methodology is appropriate to use when designing service processes, as it specifically addresses redesigning processes, which is a common occurrence in servicebased organizations.…”
Section: Supply Chain Improvement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A convergence test at the end of each step controls whether any stopping criterion is met (maximum number of generations reached or convergence rate achieved). For a detailed discussion we refer to [27]. Because of the criticism on SNRs, some authors like [48] suggest to build separate models for the mean and variance of the system performance, adopting the so-called Dual Response Surface approach.…”
Section: Extensions To Taguchi's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simulation model of a system enhances the VSM model in multiple ways (Marvel and Standridge, 2009), (El-Haik and Al-Aomar, 2006). Both structural and random variability are commonly included in simulation models and the effects of variability on system performance can be determined.…”
Section: Value Stream Mapping (Vsm) and Discrete Event Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%