Second International Conference on the Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH 2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/intech.2012.6457750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation based evaluation of MANET routing protocols for static WSN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters that are studied are energy consumption and energy-delay product. We have studied the energy consumption with some of routing protocols namely AODV, DSDV and DSR and compared the energy delay product with [4]. We have used ZigBee specifications[14] unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters that are studied are energy consumption and energy-delay product. We have studied the energy consumption with some of routing protocols namely AODV, DSDV and DSR and compared the energy delay product with [4]. We have used ZigBee specifications[14] unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of AODV, DSDV, and DSR protocols with our algorithm, we used areas of 2121m× 425m, 3000m×600m, 3675m×735m, 4250m×850m, and 5000m×1000m populated by 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 static nodes, respectively [4]. Data rate used was 4packets/sec.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static routing [5] does not reflect any topology change that occurs in the network. But dynamic routing [6] automatically discovers routes and can react to network changes.…”
Section: General Routing Protocols For Emergency and Rescue Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSR is shown to be not suitable for such conditions, while AODV is. Paper [13] compares DSR, AODV, and DSDV performance in static WSN networks using NS-2 simulations. DSR showed best performance results: packet delivery rate, average delay, routing overhead, average energy per packet.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%