2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation-based collaborative decision support for surge floods prevention in St. Petersburg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average of the b-value across all the five stages of model testing was estimated to be 0.637 and the average error percentage was estimated to be 4.80%. Further, the proposed method was compared with other existing approaches [9,30,59,67] for group decision support for the supplier selection problem. The first approach was based on the fuzzy AHP for group decision making and selected suppliers through a ranking method based on geometric mean method only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average of the b-value across all the five stages of model testing was estimated to be 0.637 and the average error percentage was estimated to be 4.80%. Further, the proposed method was compared with other existing approaches [9,30,59,67] for group decision support for the supplier selection problem. The first approach was based on the fuzzy AHP for group decision making and selected suppliers through a ranking method based on geometric mean method only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a wide variety of decision support theories has been used in the domain of supplier selection, there has been lesser exploration of decision support theories on group decision making has been explored in the supplier selection domain. For complex decision making problems, collective intelligence of a group of decision makers in consensus often is more effective than the same decision makers working in isolation [47,53,67]. In fact, group decision making under consensus has greater reliability, consistency and regularity than decision makers working in isolation for even the same prioritization problem [9,25,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), interaction with decision makers etc. [41]. Thus, the improvement of forecast quality is a significant task a) to predict floods as early as possible; b) to perform simulation-based assessment and optimization of developed plans and final decision-making support.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the other tasks, which require simulation, decision support system can be mentioned as a complex example which involves different type of users interacting with the system and with each other. An application for collaborative decision support for the task of surge floods prevention in St. Petersburg [14] was developed using touch table hardware for collaboration ( fig. 4a).…”
Section: Touch Table Application: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%