2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation-Based Assessment of Postearthquake Functionality of Buildings with Disruptions to Cross-Dependent Utility Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While structural damages from earthquakes have been investigated in various capacities, there has been a limited examination of the impact on traffic networks and the resilience of bridges after earthquakes [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Additionally, most impact analyses of traffic networks have been based on the simplified application of traffic capacity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While structural damages from earthquakes have been investigated in various capacities, there has been a limited examination of the impact on traffic networks and the resilience of bridges after earthquakes [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Additionally, most impact analyses of traffic networks have been based on the simplified application of traffic capacity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cabinet Office, Government of Japan [6] released details of the 1995 Kobe (Japan) earthquake, which had a magnitude of 7.2 (on Richter scale) with 6437 fatalities and missing persons and seriously damaged major lifelines such as bridges, roads, and subways, Sichuan (China) earthquake in 2008 which had a magnitude of 7.9 (on Richter scale), claimed 80,000 lives and damage to infrastructures due to landslides and soil liquefaction [7], Ludian (China) in 2014 which had a 6.1-magnitude (on Richter scale) claimed 600 lives and damage to lifelines and property, Kathmandu (Nepal) in 2015 with 7.8-magnitude (on Richter scale) earthquake killed 9,000 people and severely damaging lifeline system [8] Chiapas (Mexico) 8.2-magnitude (on Richter scale) earthquake in 2017 with 61 persons killed and large scale destruction due to landslides [9]. Recently, many studies have been performed based on post earthquake scenario like performance assessment of Salyankot water supply project in nepal [10], risk-based assessment of infrastructure system [11,12], firefighting capacity evaluation of water distribution system [13], collective action in post-earthquake Nepal [14], estimation of restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines [15], assessment of functionality of buildings [16], restoration of water system using discrete-event simulation [17].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of pipeline risk for ground shaking (transient ground deformation) in several different 16.79 million. The projection was nearly correct and with the average growth rate since the census of 1881, the population would touch 20.347 million by 2021.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though queuing models are used extensively in manufacturing, material-handling systems, construction systems, and infrastructure recovery, only recently have they been used in the context of post-earthquake building portfolio recovery (Costa, 2019; Masoomi and Van De Lindt, 2019; Masoomi et al, 2020). Queuing models can capture real-world components of very complex processes and take into account uncertainties through probability distributions.…”
Section: Stochastic Queuing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though their model had capabilities to include restoration priority for each neighborhood and resource constraints, their case study assumed that all resources were available, and all neighborhoods had the same priority. In another study, Masoomi et al (2020) included the residential sector in their model to study post-earthquake building functionality that accounts for other interdependent networks such as electric power and water networks. Though resource constraints were included in this study, the recovery prioritization was only applied to the infrastructure network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%