2010
DOI: 10.1097/01.numa.0000388667.17910.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and patient assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Part of the challenge to improving work assignment may simply be an inability to track work load. In a related sense, nursing has struggled with creating standardized nursing intervention terminologies for use in electronic health records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Part of the challenge to improving work assignment may simply be an inability to track work load. In a related sense, nursing has struggled with creating standardized nursing intervention terminologies for use in electronic health records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After checking the abstracts, nine relevant articles remained. 1,5,6,8,9,12,13,15,16 By performing forward and backward searches on these articles, six other relevant articles were found. [2][3][4]7,10,11 All relevant articles had been published between 1973 and 2013.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Operations researchers in Texas [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] have applied integer programming, 4,5 stochastic programming, 6 heuristics, 7 and Markov decision theory 7 to create nurse-to-patient assignments, and researchers have developed a simulation model 8,9 to evaluate such assignments. Although the literature indicates that nurses consider many different factors in deciding nurseto-patient assignments, 1,13 these models merely consider the objective of workload balancing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nursing activities score (NAS)) represents a patient-level workload (Miranda et al, 2003). Task-level measures identified in this narrative review (n ¼ 9) include direct care time (n ¼ 5), task-related time based on task complexity (NAS) (n ¼ 3), time of tasks including walking time (n ¼ 1), time spent on direct care activities, indirect care activities and non-patient activities (n ¼ 1), and ratio of non-patient activity time to patient activity time (n ¼ 1) (Hurst, 2008;Hurst, 2011;Sundaramoorthi et al, 2010;Twigg and Duffield, 2009;van den Oetelaar et al, 2016;Altafin et al, 2014;Simmons and Kuys, 2011;Debergh et al, 2012;Serafim et al, 2017). All of these metrics use the time spent performing specific tasks in quantification of workload where…”
Section: Objective Measures Of Workloadmentioning
confidence: 99%