2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-006-0122-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and parametric study of a novel multi-spray emitter for ESI–MS applications

Abstract: In this work, we propose a novel carbon nanofiber (CNF) emitter for electrospray ionization (ESI)-mass spectrometry (MS) applications. The proposed emitter comprises an array of CNFs around the orifice of a microscale capillary. The electrospray ionization process is simulated using a CFD code based on Taylor-Melcher leaky-dielectric formulations for solving the electrohydrodynamics and volume-of-fluid (VOF) method for tracking the interface. The code is validated for a conventional multiple electrospray emitt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to attain stable electrospray signals at nano flow rates, tapered emitters were fabricated using techniques such as pulling or chemically etching fused silica to create 1 to 20 µm sized apertures 12–15. However, single‐tip tapered emitters with less than 20 µm diameter apertures often encounter problems such as clogging and larger flow resistance due to the nature of the smaller aperture 7, 16…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to attain stable electrospray signals at nano flow rates, tapered emitters were fabricated using techniques such as pulling or chemically etching fused silica to create 1 to 20 µm sized apertures 12–15. However, single‐tip tapered emitters with less than 20 µm diameter apertures often encounter problems such as clogging and larger flow resistance due to the nature of the smaller aperture 7, 16…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These emitters proved robust to clogging and had improved nanoelectrospray performance compared to cleaved open tube and conventional emitters. Instead of forming a centered array of multiple electrospray emitters/channels, Knapp and co‐workers have proposed a multiple electrospray emitter comprising an array of carbon nanofibers (CNFs) around the orifice of a capillary 16. The proposed design would facilitate nanoelectrospray through a relatively large open tube.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the total ESI current generated at a given flow rate was shown to be proportional to the square root of the number of emitters allowing “brighter” ion sources [28]. The combined smaller charged droplets and high electric current has made the emitter array a promising ESI source for high sensitivity MS [2534] and a variety of other applications such as nanoparticle synthesis [35], space propulsion [36], and microcombustion [37]. In the case of utilizing emitter array for MS analysis it is possible to tune the fabrication to further increase emitter density, but it is all of marginal benefit if the additional current generated cannot be efficiently delivered into the low pressure region of the mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique known as electrohydrodynamic atomization or electrospraying (Cloupeau & Prunet-Foch, 1994;Nguyen et al, 2014;Wang & Mamishev, 2012a,b;Wilhelm et al, 2003) employs an electric field as the droplet generation mechanism wherein counterions in the fluid are attracted to the tip of the meniscus protruding from a nozzle when it is raised to an applied potential. Due to Coulombic repulsion, the tip, which deforms into a conical shape known as the Taylor cone (Taylor, 1964), subsequently disintegrates to produce a thin jet that breaks up due to Coulombic fission or hydrodynamic instabilities to form the droplets (Sen et al, 2007), which are then attracted to the surface of the collection electrode, which acts as the thermal exchange surface. While electrospray cooling is able to achieve high heat removal rates, a disadvantage of the technique is the requirement of a very high DC voltage supply ( $ 10 3 V).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%