2012
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and Modelization of Parabolic Solar Concentrator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plant area for PD system is small compared to the other solar technologies plant. Moreover, PD is one of solar energy technologies that has higher efficiencies which is nearly 31.25% [8,18,19].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant area for PD system is small compared to the other solar technologies plant. Moreover, PD is one of solar energy technologies that has higher efficiencies which is nearly 31.25% [8,18,19].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they are various PV models available, we found that there is limited literature on the modelling of concentrating PV (CPV) to characterise the output of the CPV design. Kaddour and Benyocef [40] simulated and modelled a parabolic concentrator, however, their work only showed the effect of meteorological parameters (i.e., direct solar isolation, ambient temperature, air density, sun elevation angel and the wind speed) on the energy output. Benrhouma et al [41] used MATLAB to compare the performance of a CPV module with and without cooling system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared their model with experimental data and found that the model achieved a root mean square error of 3.48%. All these work [40][41][42] did not indicate or specify the I-V and P-V characteristics of the CPV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%