The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and measurements of wind interference on a solar chimney performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…however, some of these studies have matched the results of this software with experimental and empirical data and verify the results of EnergyPlus (Loutzenhiser et al, 2007;Mateus et al, 2014;Tabares-Velasco et al, 2012;Anđelković et al, 2016;Yun and Kim, 2013;Eskandari et al, 2018). By way of example, it should be mentioned that the results of the solar chimney and sunspace researches affirm high correspondence to the experimental field data (Asadi et al, 2016;Jiménez-Xamán et al, 2019;Neves and Marques da Silva, 2018;DeBlois et al, 2013b;Wang et al, 2019;Ulpiani et al, 2019;Sánchez-Ostiz et al, 2014;Rempel et al, 2016). A comprehensive explanation of the validation study and a detailed analysis of the results can be noticed in another current paper by the authors (Eskandari et al, 2018).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…however, some of these studies have matched the results of this software with experimental and empirical data and verify the results of EnergyPlus (Loutzenhiser et al, 2007;Mateus et al, 2014;Tabares-Velasco et al, 2012;Anđelković et al, 2016;Yun and Kim, 2013;Eskandari et al, 2018). By way of example, it should be mentioned that the results of the solar chimney and sunspace researches affirm high correspondence to the experimental field data (Asadi et al, 2016;Jiménez-Xamán et al, 2019;Neves and Marques da Silva, 2018;DeBlois et al, 2013b;Wang et al, 2019;Ulpiani et al, 2019;Sánchez-Ostiz et al, 2014;Rempel et al, 2016). A comprehensive explanation of the validation study and a detailed analysis of the results can be noticed in another current paper by the authors (Eskandari et al, 2018).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Though this could lead to extended simulation intervals, by using different assumptions, quantitative and qualitative analyses of the wind effect could be performed through various simulation tools [3,4]. The building thermal analysis and the energy required to maintain occupants' thermal comfort would be affected by the impact of different simulation hypotheses [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%