2006
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/16/4/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and fabrication of SiO2-based piezoresistive microbridges for chem/biosensors

Abstract: This paper uses finite element design for optimization of piezoresistive silicon covered SiO 2 microbridges. Resistance changes of the microbridge due to the surface stress changes were systematically investigated by varying Si piezoresistor geometries and the boron doping concentrations in silicon. Our simulation results show that the resistance change of the microbridge is directly related to the arcuation of the microbridges and a better R/R response can be obtained with a thinner and narrower silicon piezo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is believed that microbridges may prove more stable than microcantilevers, although potentially at the expense of reduced sensitivity. To date, microbridges have not been extensively investigated for biosensing applications (Adrega et al, 2006;Lu et al, 2006). The principle strengths of micro-or nano-cantilever-based oligonucleotide sensors are easy functionalisation, ready optimisation through manipulation of the sensor geometry, and scalability, with existing fabrication techniques translating into the preparation of large arrays Ziegler, 2004).…”
Section: Target Reference(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that microbridges may prove more stable than microcantilevers, although potentially at the expense of reduced sensitivity. To date, microbridges have not been extensively investigated for biosensing applications (Adrega et al, 2006;Lu et al, 2006). The principle strengths of micro-or nano-cantilever-based oligonucleotide sensors are easy functionalisation, ready optimisation through manipulation of the sensor geometry, and scalability, with existing fabrication techniques translating into the preparation of large arrays Ziegler, 2004).…”
Section: Target Reference(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doping concentrations affect the piezoresistive coefficient in the [1 1 0] direction for P-type Si. The piezoresistive coefficients in the longitudinal (π l ) and transverse (π t ) directions are 71.8 × 10 −11 Pa −1 and −66.3 × 10 −11 Pa −1 , respectively, and these are assumed to be constant for low doping concentrations (<10 17 cm −3 ) [9,10]. The targeted doping concentration is approximately 4 × 10 18 cm −3 , and it is relatively high, although it will reduce the temperature dependence.…”
Section: Osmotic Pressure Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties of Si and the piezoresistive coefficients for the P-type Si used in this work are listed in table 1 [10,13]. The reference glucose concentration inside the device cavity is kept at 100 mg dL −1 .…”
Section: Simulation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro cantilevers have ability to show higher sensitivity [2][3]. Detecting mechanism of smaller scale cantilever biosensor varies as indicated by application [4][5][6]. The capacitive technique gives more sensitivity compared with mechanical stress and piezoresistive structure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%