2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and experimental studies on fluidization properties in a pressurized jetting fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 compare well with the experiments at JJ = 4 em but at y = 8 em the 2D data deviates from the other data. Similar discrepancies have been shown by others [3,[25][26][27]]. …”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…5 compare well with the experiments at JJ = 4 em but at y = 8 em the 2D data deviates from the other data. Similar discrepancies have been shown by others [3,[25][26][27]]. …”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The experimental data and 3D simulations are local time-average values along a ray that passes through the centerline of the bed and side injection port at the given z height. The variations in the experimental data are attributed to the non-uniform inlet conditions that result from the 62 discrete air inlet holes of the distributor plate, and similar discrepancies have been shown by others [36][37][38][39]. The 3D prediction compares very well with the experiment, whereas the 2D simulation significantly overpredicts the presence of gas near the lower region of the bed (Fig.…”
Section: Two-and Three-dimensional Simulationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The direction of the holes in the distributor is set parallel to the FB wall inclination. Some papers studied the conical fluidized bed with conical distributor which is roughly stands for ash-agglomerating fluidized bed coal gasifier (Cao et al, 2008;Bi and Kojima, 1996;et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%